Search results matching tags 'MAPPA' and 'Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons'

Lord Justice Moses caught on VIDEO Refusing re Dr Tegwyn Williams' Falsifed Medical Records Conspiracy to obtain My IPP Imprisonment

Maurice — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:07:00 GMT

Royal Courts of Justice, today...What a load of nonsense. The Appeal before Lord Justice Moses et al, was today!

"No, Mr Kirk, you cannot have an oral hearing ....we have already decided to dismiss your Appeal" (arguing with Cardiff judge, Nicholas Cooke QC, who damned well knew Williams was lying nor had the qualifications to try and section me to Broadmoor, on his interpretation of an NHS brain scan!

Now RCJ judges are in on the act.

Imagine that approximate account of what was said in front of Rear Admiral rtd. Norman Scarth Esq. provoked?!

The pandemonium in number 9 court, with utterances of truth only from the well of the court, leading to eight security guards, ready to drag out two old men must be published see video here:

A Den of Evil - Maurice Kirk & Norman Scarth in court 28/6/2011

Anarchy is just around the corner and it starts at Cardiff Magistrates tomorrow at 10 am. and then across the country

See new photos on Gallery.

A Bradford judge sent Patrick Cullinane to prison for four months simply for using an audio recorder in court.
If Lord 'Justice'(??) Moses had any guts he would have stayed in court, called security to take us down to the cells & then sent us to prison, as Patrick was. Instead, while the next case was supposed to be proceeding, he, Mr Justice Maddison and Leeds Recorder all scuttled out like frightened rabbits, leaving the pathetic female usher to act as though she were God Almighty!
Norman Scarth

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Protected by Royal Charter so Sale of Maurice's 5 Bedroomed House not even covers RCVS Legal Costs

Maurice — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:25:00 GMT

Investigation into Royal Charters

EXPLICIT ORDER

These orders specifically require ministers and judges* to treat the chartered body ‘in the most favourable and beneficial sense' for its ‘best advantage.' This is to be done despite wrongdoing, specifically including ‘non-recital' (concealment) and ‘mis-recital' (deception).

The 1967 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Act omits ‘mis -recital'

A Number of European Court of Human Rights Applications are currently being prepared in Brittany now that Maurice is struggling but ‘out of the woods, medically and well off the daily morphine!

‘A Royal Charter' is the common thread between the South Wales Police, in 2001, making complaint to have Maurice struck off the veterinary register, for life, just for questioning ‘authority' through the courts and a recent Criminal Court of Appeal Judgment, Regina v Maurice Kirk , for ‘Contempt of Court', currently applied for to go to the Supreme Court as the hearing appears contrary to Article 6.

Dr Tegwyn Williams, in August 2009, was employed by Wales HM Partnership to fabricate false medical evidence, for which he had no qualifications, to have Maurice incarcerated, without trial, in a high security hospital, possibly for life. His medical reports stated Maurice having, ‘significant brain damage and possible tumour'.

Each Royal Charter affecting the ten judges, including the Recorder of Cardiff, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, who three times, alone, refused bail on this medical evidence, that Maurice was too dangerous to be released, can be read on transcripts on this website Downloads.

The Court of Appeal Judgment is likely to refuse permission for the case to go to the Supreme Court due to the fact the ‘argument' with HHJ Cooke QC , in Cardiff Crown Court, a year earlier, had before him the now proved falsified medical evidence, proved by other medical reports, then withheld from His Honour, including a clear brain scan of August 2009 organised by Williams, no less, as Director of the Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend!........

.......this document will expand on a weekly basis until all Royal Charters , affecting Maurice's life, have been appropriately exposed to the general public as a warning of what is yet to come.

copy of HCHR applications shortly and any help in preparation always appreciated.

Happy Easter

First Petition to Parliament on Behalf of Victims of White Collar Crime

Maurice — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:22:00 GMT

The following Petition has been submitted to our new MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP, following a very lively debate at our 25th January 2011 House of Commons meeting with both Members of the House of Lords and House of Commons in attendance, a committee room, I may say, STUFFED with Victims of the banks, HM and our law courts, solicitors and NHS (see photo gallery, other blogs and PDF downloads).

To the House of Commons

The petition of Maurice J Kirk BVSc, a citizen of the UK at 52, Tynewydd Road, Barry CF62 8AZ, declares that he has tried everything in his powers as a former veterinary surgeon to stand up to the harassment of South Wales Police who have delayed his civil action against them.

The citizen has suffered from harassment by South Wales Police that culminated in 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months in a psychiatric clinic, after getting him struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons.

One of the incidents in a series of interconnected legal actions was the machine gun case. The allegation was the possession and sale of a ‘gun' even though it was decommissioned and an ‘add on' to an historic aircraft. In the run up to the trial, however, South Wales Police mobilised Multi-Agency Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) hoping to shoot or section the citizen for life. MAPPA categorisation was used for imprisonment which included 3 months in a psychiatric clinic. A leaked MAPPA document, published on his website www.kirkflyingvet.com, shows that the Police had a firearms response.

The harassment included the falsification of medical records claiming that he has serious brain damage, possibly brain cancer, to get him sectioned. This prevented his surgical team from carrying out a hip replacement scheduled for June 2010.

While the citizen won the machine gun case in court, he did not get any costs or compensation for malicious prosecution, false imprisonments and generally the deprivation of his human and professional rights as a veterinary surgeon.

The petitioner therefore requests that the Government steps in as Compensator of Last Resort

Dear Mr Cairns,

The 25th January meeting at the House of Commons was a resounding success with many Members from both Houses, with 'like minds', all in one room! The ever widening divide between the basic rules of justice and the conduct of the South Wales Police, our law courts, Crown Prosecution Service and now, HM Court Service, is really most serious because it is clear there is no accountability for their joint actions.,.

South Wales National Health Service and our Health Minister refuse to hand over my medical records in their current control and with CPS, police, Caswell Clinic, HM Prison, Cardiff, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood are all refusing to clarify, with my surgeons, my medical history when I was in prison custody meaning still further delay in my much needed hip operation.

When can I next see you, please, either in London or Barry? I have currently obtained asylum in France following the repeated attempts by the South Walers Police to either have me shot or jailed for life so any meeting must be before my witnesses and suitably recorded.

Yours sincerely, .

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Do Our Welsh Courts Behave any Worse than Those in England?

Maurice — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:36:00 GMT

I pose a question for the discerning twenty odd % of our Principality’s electorate that bothered to get off their butt, that day, to vote against devolution. Considering the serious situation the UK is now in, suffering from post Blair and his collateral damage, never so bad since early September 1940, may I suggest you browse a few articles in the pockets of this website, written with you in mind, to try and suggest an alternative to ‘Lawful Rebellion’, 'taking to the streets’ and protesting, before we have the wisely predicted, in the 60s, ‘rivers of blood’ or something much worse.

To assist the 'uninitiated', unaware of the day to day 'Affairs of the Welsh State', please read the following 'horror story' as a sample of things to come, if someone, perhaps you, fails to de-rail their tax payer funded 'gravy train'.

Machine Gun Case

•1. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft for museum and display purposes.

•2. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 aircraft and ‘gun' from a private collection with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' as an integral part of the British registered airframe.

•3. . 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This later became the critical argument in the 2010 Cardiff Crown Court trial.

•4. 2000: The DH2 flew at the Farnborough Air Show following a personal invitation from Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame. On her return to Wales she suffered a propeller failure.

•5. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' dismounted for much of the time.

•6. 2007: The DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out at the RAF main gate to a civilian for further repair.

•7. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and gun to another display pilot who modified the gun, the prosecution knew only too well, for his own purposes.

•8. 1st June 2009 Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) were mobilised by South Wales Police hoping to either shoot or jail MJK, under the 1983 Mental Health Act. This followed the Chief Constable having signed a false affidavit on 25th Feb 09, in the ongoing civil damages claim for false imprisonments and malicious prosecutions, in which she denied knowledge of police incidents including lost court cases and their breaking into MJK's veterinary surgery.

•9. 8th June: MAPPA meeting categorised MJK as Level 3 (top 5% most dangerous) as ‘being in possession of the machine gun and ammunition' based, the court was later told, on photographs and sale adverts, all dating back to the year before and some as far back as 2001, when first advertised for sale in CAA and other aviation journals.

•10. 18th June: MJK obtained entry to the offices of the Chief Constable, at Bridgend HQ, for the purposes of arresting her for falsifying the affidavit. Also, the need for ‘mutual exchange' of witness statements, on a court deadline of 19th June 4pm, meant MJK took them with him to her office. Armed police surrounded the building in tin hats carrying CS and smoke grenades.

•11. 19th June: Solicitors for the police also refused to ‘exchange' witness statements and laid complaint of ‘threat to commit criminal damage' when MJK apparently suggested they may therefore be delivered through their front window, attached to a 'gurt' brick.

12. 21st June: A sizable armed police raid on MJK's home, with helicopter, was aborted only because, the court heard later, MJK was in the garden, drinking tea with his wife and could only be arrested ‘whist away from the house'.

•13. 22nd June: A twenty five plus Trojan police team arrested him in his village, for ‘possession of a machine gun, ammo and threats of criminal damage'. The new owner was then telephoned by the Civil Aviation Authority to deposit ‘gun' with a gun dealer where Welsh police later seized it.

•14. The ‘gun', recovered in Lincolnshire, was then hawked from pillar to post, well over 2000 miles, in the back of Welsh police cars, all over England and Wales, often by only one police officer, contrary to regulations, attempting to get someone somewhere to state the pile of WW1 metal was dangerous while MJK was n possession, a year earlier and now, in its newly modified state.

•15. 23rd June: MJK is charged with ‘possession of machine gun' and its ‘resale', each carrying two mandatory five year prison sentences, with the original seller of the gun to MJK and final recipient promised immunity to prosecution for they were needed as prosecution witnesses.

•16. 24th June: Barry Magistrates' unconditional bail was immediately overturned on CPS Appeal, next day, when he was remanded in custody by Cardiff Crown Court, despite there being no evidence given of ‘likely to abscond', ‘re offend' or would ‘commit a crime'. Nine further Welsh judges were to refuse him bail over nearly eight months which, with their original argument that he was mentally far too dangerous to be given bail, leaves many un answered questions.

•17. 2nd December: The Crown Prosecutor and Dr Tegwyn Williams pleaded in Cardiff Crown Court, using falsified NHS medical records, to have MJK sectioned to a High Security Psychiatric Prison, for life. Only the foresight of an already prepared defense, by way of a privately funded neuro-radiologist's report, served on Cardiff Crown Court just the day before, saved the day

•18. 25th January 2010: The ridiculous trial, therefore, had to go ahead, so relevant disclosure of the conspiracy and access to MJK's potential witnesses was sufficiently blocked by the trial judge to further anger the jury, as MJK was told, when meeting the them immediately after the trial.

•19. 9th February: Cross examination of police was so seriously restricted the jury, therefore, were not allowed to hear any defense evidence. The Jury informed MJK their verdict was concluded after the very first day of prosecution evidence. Cross examination of police witnesses confirmed they had also modified the ‘gun' to protect their prosecution witnesses by attempting to revert the piece of metal back to fit MJK's 2008 photographs published on his web site. He was never allowed to examine the prosecution main exhibit, the ‘gun;, before or during the trial.

•20. April. The trial judge refused MJK any costs, not even for transcripts of hearings in his absence, previously ordered to be reimbursed by The Recorder of Cardiff, HHJ N Cooke QC or claim bus fares and hotel bills incurred by his witnesses who had travelled from all over the country.

•21. 24th June: Judge Cooke sentenced MJK to prison for 28 days for arguing over the disclosure of his falsified medical records used by Dr Tegwyn Williams which, today, is still delaying his much needed hip operation. Judge Cooke also reversed his earlier decision that MJK could hear the tape, see the court logs and be reimbursed for the pre paid court transcripts.

•22. MJK's Contempt of Court appeal is currently before the Criminal Court of Appeal in London where he will, again, be asking Their Lordships for the release of those medical records, that stated,‘ significant brain damage' and ‘possible brain tumour', concocted by the HM Crown Prosecutor, Mr Thomlow, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood before His Honour Judge Bidder QC, on 2nd Dec 2009, with MJK, unrepresented, locked up below the court.

•23. DAMAGES are sought for malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, fraudulent sectioning and for their deliberate delaying the civil action against South Wales Police that had been running for nearly 19 years. The conduct of HM Court Service and others leaves MJK in some difficulties.

•24. The entire Welsh National Health Service has now closed ranks in this multi agency ‘cover up' with the Welsh Health Minister, Edwina Hart AM, area NHS manager, Mr David Sissling, HM Prison Medical Centre, Cardiff Crown Court, Recorder of Cardiff, Nicholas Cooke QC, Princess of Wales Hospital Records Department, Caswell Clinic Psychiatric Prison, Cardiff Civil Court judges, General Medical Council (Wales), Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood, the original culprits, all, apparently, ‘burying their heads in sand' expecting the consequences of their orchestrated conduct, causing so much suffering, to disappear..

•25. Meanwhile French doctors, just as MJK's private surgical team in South Wales did, in June 2010, have cancelled an urgent hip replacement operation due to the Principality's refusal to clarify just what went on in MAPPA at least seven meetings in 2009, to have MJK in a position to be possibly shot or spirited away, behind bars, for life, on spurious medical grounds fabricated on the original instructions of senior officers of the South Wales Police.

•26. Only a Government Remedy can compensate for the violation of human and professional rights by the Welsh authorities once again experienced by myself.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

4th February 2011

In Support of Victims of Financial Exploitation and Legal Oppression

Maurice — Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:55:00 GMT

Hello and Happy New 2011!

No matter whether you, like Lewis Nicholson with his "Victim of Judicial Fraud" shirt, have come to any of our meetings in Westminster before, you are invited to join us on Tuesday, January 25th! Under the auspices of our Chairman Austin Mitchell MP, I looked for support from other MPs, especially those who have signed Early Day Motions (EDMs) covering issues that are relevant to our causes.

I also invited those MPs whose victims are among the four fraudulent bankruptcies we presented to the Lord Chancellor Kenneth Clarke QC MP and the Business Minister Vincent Cable MP. And I invited the MPs whose cases I put before the EU Commission for Justice, besides a few others whose stories I published on Victims Unite!

However, it is really important that you invite your MP yourself to attend, especially if you intend to be there, too! For there is a Parliamentary Rule that says that MPs only need to respond to their constituents!

To ask your MP to write letters on your behalf is always a constructive request you can make! Send them the report Victims of Financial Exploitation and Legal Oppression and, where appropriate, Compensator of Last Resort.

To illustrate that you are not alone, you can also refer to our two petitions with their marvellous comments:

Stop the Oppression of the British People with 1305 signatures and 13 comment pages

WANTED: Fair Trials and Compensation with 205 signatures and 6 comment pages.

While the second petition stressed the need of support for Maurice J Kirk BVSc, he will not be able to join us, as he is still in political asylum in Brittany, for fear of being jailed or shot. However, his MP Alun Cairns has been very responsive and supportive so far!

In my requests for support, I asked:

"Would you be willing to ask questions with written answers to find out what victims are expected to do when they have all the evidence of unlawfulness, but get neither restitution or compensation? Would you be willing to find out when the Lord Chancellor will close the human rights gap between the EU and the UK? On Tuesday, January 25th, 2 - 4pm, our Chairman Austin Mitchell MP will convene a meeting of victims and supportive MPs. Can we count on your presence, too? If not, can we count on you being part of a "Virtual All Party Parliamentary Group" to take our issues further, i.e. be on a mailing list that I will maintain?"

Besides Austin Mitchell MP, Lord Sudeley, co-founder of the Forum for Stable Currencies, has confirmed to attend.
Nic Dakin, MP for veteran victim Stanley Embling, intends to be with us.
John McDonnell MP "will do his best" to be there.
John Hemming MP "may be able to attend".

You are invited to send in your question(s) for MPs asap, hoping that some more of the 100 odd MPs will want to come and answer them!

At our last meeting, Austin Mitchell MP suggested, we should organise our own Public Inquiry, but I don't feel enough support for such a venture. Instead, I hope that victims learn to communicate with their MPs such that they get the best out of them and that the list of supportive MPs gets longer and longer.

As a first most promising step, Nick Hurd MP is acting on behalf of his constituent Patrick Cullinane: Minister demands action over bankrupted taxpayer.

Will your case be the next one so that we can have a truly Happy 2011?

On Tuesday, January 25th, people can join us in the Jubilee Cafe of the House of Commons from 11am onwards. At 1.45pm we will move to the designated Committee Room.

Please take heart and RSVP to sabine@3d-metrics.com, if you can make it on January 25th!

MANY THANKS to everybody who signed and commented and my very best wishes for your fighting spirit in the New Year!

Sabine
Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies
McKenzie Friend and web publisher, Victims Unite!

HM Privy Council to hear Application for Maurice to be Restored to the Veterinary Register

Maurice — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:50:00 GMT

A flurry of activity in the courts these past seven days.

First, the South Wales Police are ordered to release their version of MAPPA 'executive summary' of their attempts to have Maurice sectioned to HM Broadmoor psychiatric prison IPP (Imprisonment for Public Protection).

Today, Barry Magistrates dismissed in 90 seconds, timed by a well wisher, a charge carrying a 6 month prison sentence on 'racially aggravated public order'. The CPS are saying Maurice's outstanding Cardiff magistrates conviction and warrant for arrest may be reviewed and put back in court.

Meanwhile, the French Authorities in Paris have arranged asylum proceedings to progress further with interrogation, finger prints and medical etc, this week. .

But far more important than that lot put together, now an e-mail from the Supreme Court building, Parliament Square, London, stating Maurice's application, refused by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons over six years, to allow him a 'right of audience' to apply to practice, is to be deliberated upon by Their Lordships very shortly.

One outstanding problem......Maurice is, again, being denied 'right of audience' at the Judicial Committee hearing, contrary to Article 6 of either 1998 Human Rights Act or the real MCoy, the 10th December 1948 European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Just one more warning to the 'thinking section' of our sleepy community as to the 'end game' being played out by the lawyers in our government, of what ever colour or creed..

It is almost laughable: in 1991, Maurice left Guernsey, a sinister tax haven flying an HM UK flag, in a boot of his car, to an awaiting rigid inflatable, with a two year tap on his telephone by insular minded police, with warrant for his arrest.

He returns this week, but no arrest for fear of publicity of MAPPA and South Wales Police harassment to have him shot, while NHS falsifying his medical records, with the hope Maurice is locked away for life, IPP [Imprisonment for Public Protection].

Complete D notice on all national and local newspapers in the UK is a clear warning to you all of what is to come.

Today's letter to NHS, lest they forget, by McKenzie Friend Sabine:

Dear Ms Bloomfield,

Many thanks indeed for your email and attempt to deliver documents to Mr Kirk. Let me assure you that there is no need to do so, for the following reasons:

1. The patient, and his surgical team, primarily need the information given in the 2nd Dec 09 Cardiff Crown Court hearing, before HHJ Bidder QC, by Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood, as they are supposed to have referred to "serious brain damage" and "possibly brain cancer". Please note that the transcript of that hearing (also attached), during which HHJ Bidder allows Mr Kirk to see the reports, starts only at 11.39.

2. Written applications by the patient, his MP and his friends, to each doctor, the South Wales NHS and everyone imaginable, have proven fruitless, partly blocked by your solicitor, I now understand.

3. The Health Minister of the Welsh Assembly does not want to intervene despite new MAPPA evidence.

4. Previous medical records, released by NHS, Caswell Clinic and HM Prison Cardiff, have all omitted what was mentioned during the 2nd December 09 Court hearing in absence of the patient, as he was detained and unrepresented down below.

5. HM Court Service refuses to disclose both the relevant court transcript and the court log of the proceedings, despite the patient's application before The Recorder of Cardiff, HHJ Cooke QC.

6. HM Court Service has refused to put the matter to either the trial judge, HHJ Peter Thomas QC or HHJ Judge Bidder QC to sort this matter out.

7. The GP has been refused a NHS brain scan for the patient and now morphine sulphate is being prescribed for daily use, due to the most unusual and extreme circumstances of the court case.

8. If, as Dr Williams told the judge, the patient may have a brain tumour, why was nothing done about it during his forced incarceration in Cardiff prison until his release on the 9th February 2010?

9. If, as Professor Wood wrote, there was damage to make the patient unsafe to be released back into society, why was he set free without a penny compensation or indication of any medical care being required?

10. The recent release of a MAPPA Executive Summary confirms monthly meetings, throughout the patient's long imprisonment on remand, unconvicted. The meetings took place in the South Wales Police forensic psychiatric prison while the patient was incarcerated there under section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act, obtained by the Director of that establishment, a Dr Tegwyn Williams, without having even examined Maurice Kirk!

I therefore repeat the request for the information as formulated in point 1, which can easily be sent by email to either maurice@kirkflyingvet.com or g-kurk@hotmail.co.uk

South Wales Judge throws out Maurice's 18 year Argument of Police Harassment and Deliberate Inaction to Investigate Crime against him and his Family

Maurice — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:43:00 GMT

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC's 30th November 2010 Preliminary Judgment here.

This cannot be understood without

The Claimant's Rebuttal to Strike Out Incidents
his 'schedule' of 41 motoring incidents.

Whilst in Alderney, Channel Islands, Maurice sent this fascinating and highly original letter to Cardiff County Court in which he asks the Judge to reconsider the basis for striking out one of the actions.

Hobbling along memory lane, where Maurice is hugged by old ladies whose dogs and cats he operated on, he's also applied for asylum. According to UN regulation, a refugee is a person who has fled war or OTHER VIOLENCE in their home country.

Having read the 40-page judgment, which needs a response within 7 days (!), one must talk about the adversarial system of law being a kind of legalised violence in itself, especially as “the one great principle of English Law is, to make business for itself…”

As I helped with the first document, I feel like writing

"Your Honour, or Dear Judge, (I know it's not done to write to judges at all...)

As a former computer programmer, my brain is highly trained in logic. This is to suggest that the logic applied in your 152 paragraphs of judgment is biased. Biased towards the Defendant as a "public authority". "Public policy"is used as an excuse for assuming that the Police can't do wrong."

I consider it utterly disgusting that "the Law" is used to split hairs between oodles of incidents that one individual has endured instead of looking at the experiences of the individual as a whole. Typically male and analytical, instead of balanced and holistic, despite the "abundant caution" supposedly exercised.

Here are my observations - for the Court of Public Opinion (website readers instead of a jury):

good resume of Maurice's issues in para 1
the Police's issues in para 2 read questionable to me: "public policy vs no cause of action to an individual", "no privately actionable duty of care", "not entitled to re-open". The rat I smell is about "the establishment never acting on individual cases" while, in my view, society consists of individuals, even if they are employed in organisations pertaining to HM Establishment
the next paras show his "abundant caution" to take into account that Maurice is a litigant in person
paras 4 to 13: the Yorkshire Ripper case and others are cited to defend the Police's absence of "negligence of care" or "privately actionable duty of care" as "public policy" or the "Hill principle"
paras 19 to 29 are grouped under "Duty of Care: the allegations subject to application to Strike Out"
in para 21 you believe that it is NOT the "duty of care" to investigate stolen cheques. I wonder why ex-policeman Albert Burgess writes that it is illegal not to investigate a crime... You feel that malicious intent should have been repeated. Oh dear, what a mistake made by the Claimant Maurice who puts together lots of incidents to prove malicious intent as the underlying attitude...
para 24: what twists between the 'general' and the 'specific': an individual police officer and the Police as a whole to conclude that the stealing of cheques must be struck out. I can only call this logic "interesting" and distinctly NOT taking the full picture into account.
para 26 and 27: "no privately actionable duty of care" to investigate crime. What a twist of argument, I'm sorry to say.
paras 30 to 37 cover Liability of the police as bailee of property and/or in negligence. They claim that the investigation and suppression of crime allows the Police to commit further 'damaging actions'. Nice to know. Is it "just, fair and reasonable" to expect Mr Kirk to write the best arguments in the best style whilst in pain and the side effects of morphine?
"public policy" reasons apply to ALL police forces, but could it not be "organisational policy" to harass a particular targeted individual?
paras 38 to 43 cover Claims alleged to be an abuse of process. Legal principle itself and refer to precedent cases. The most ironic quote is "the one the one great principle of English Law is, to make business for itself…..” LOTS of victims have experienced how true that is!!! Maurice calls it the public gravy train, when the public purse is concerned as when a Police Force is involved...
para 42 quotes: He claims however that bif the right arguments had been used or evidence called, it would have been decided differently.
paras 44 to 52 cover Claims alleged to be an abuse of process. Application of legal principle to the acts alleged by Mr Kirk.
para 53 to 66: Claim in Action 1 – Paragraph 8.12 4th October 1993
para 61: "It is also at the very foundation of this case that Mr Kirk has a burning
sense of injustice about past wrongs. Whether that burning sense of
injustice is based upon real or imaginary fact is of no consequence to
us. ….. Mr Kirk told us in evidence, and I suspect will always believe,
that there is always some form of conspiracy against his interests. It
was a constant theme in his questions to the police constables. He put
to them that each constable knew all about him and that they were
involved in some kind of vendetta or, perhaps cover up of police wrong
doing or, maybe inefficiency."
para 67 to 77: Claim in Action 2 paragraph 3.1- 12th May 1996 - crossing a white line - struck out.
para 78 to 82: Claim in Action 2 paragraph 9 – 1.12.1999 – driving at Llantwit Major - struck out.
para 83 to 86: Action 2 paragraph 11 – 5.4.2000 – driving in Albany Road - .
para 87 to 99; para 114: ... in respect of the other road traffic offences, Mr Kirk is entitled to invite the court to consider a claim for malicious prosecution. I am dealing with whether it would be an abuse of process to pursue them, not with whether they appear to me to be strong or merely “arguable” claims.
para 100 to 114: The video issue: Maurice is entitled to invite the court to consider a claim for malicious prosecution.
para 115 to 131: Action 3 paragraph 2 – 19.8.1998 – Vale of Glamorgan Show.
para 132 to 151: MAPPA documents
para 143 states The Defendant (Police) submits that the Executive Summary itself should not be disclosed to Mr Kirk, on the basis that (i) it is not material to his proceedings and (ii) that it should not be disclosed for reasons of public interest immunity.

Racially Aggravated Threat Trial Starts Today

Maurice — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:32:00 GMT

HM Crown Prosecution are still refusing to hand over my Dr Tegwyn Williams medical records, used on the 2nd December 09, to keep me locked up. Now they affect my trial today, in Barry magistrates, see here. All the HM courts are now blocking my e-mails and I have received a letter from HM Partnership stating I am not allowed to enter any civil or criminal court in South Wales at all, without prior written consent.

Well, past invitations to court have never, actually, been a great thrill, but just how else am I expected to do my target practice now? On a machine gun range?

Last minute invitation by Judge Seys Llewellyn QC results in 15 pages to Court this morning

Maurice — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:29:00 GMT

Friday night I received the email with the invitation to provide a "further submission" by Monday morning 10.30am. What a way to determine the agenda for a weekend in Brittany!

Well, the outcome was "angelic": the input from McKenzie Angels who contributed to these 15 pages. What difference will they make?

We can only hope that the 4 leaked pages will catapult the Defendant into constructive action rather than perpetuate "verbal diarrhea" as my son called it, when he observed what went on in the courts. He actually wrote down "Birmingham 6 case!!! Trying to use processes later found to be corrupt & improper as a basis to strike out this case, must rate as one of the most incompetent arguments I ever heard!..."

Mes voisins have invited me 'on quad and sticks a la foret, demain, to search for the elusive cepes et chanterelles fungi pour oeuf method chez Maurice... Who wants to go back to Wales when tomorrow, the Long Eared Owl, tooting from my barn or that wild boar, caught on my lawn, defecating again, will cause me to wake from my slumbers, only to wander down to the lake and catch a fat carp for lunch and supper?

Leaked Police Report on MAPPA Meetings to Kill Claimant - Contrary to Basic Human Rights!?

Maurice — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:34:00 GMT

Here is just the beginning and here is my shaky speech in the House of Lords meeting, just after my lucky escape, of just why I could not divulge, last year to my family and friends, my defences when charged with a mandatory ten year minimum prison sentence or an Imprisonment for Public Protection [IPP], for life, in a High Security Psychiatric Prison........ Your comments would be greatly appreciated!

In December 09, my London solicitors had written to the police HQ, to MAPPA Co-ordinator, Nigel Rees, who confirmed MAPPA categorisation. The delay in my arrest that followed, around two weeks, was deliberate with the hope I would again make a lawful approach to the Chief Constable, thus allowing police sniper fire to do the rest. There is much video of the incident that sparked all this off. All this police activity, caught on video, but the Crown Court trial judge, Paul somebody, because it was like something out of "The Keystone Cops" blocked it from the jury, following my application for disclosure. Scenes includeded, totally out ofcontrol, 'Trojan' squad of police, armed with their own machine guns, all wearing tin hats, as I attempted mutual exchange of witness statements, in the seventeen year running civil action. This was all being acted out in the inner sanctum of Police HQ, Bridgend. Quite innappropiate for a jury, the judge considered, having already refused any other police disclosure that might further reveal his small minded cabal's ultimate intention.