Search results matching tags 'MAPPA' and 'Machine Gun'

Police Steal my Computer and Original Witness Statements Confirming their Conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams

Maurice — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:09:00 GMT

I have just been released from police cells only to be admitted into hospital for abdominal investigations. I enclose part of what I think is going on by the part prepared affidavit below. This is only my current draft preparation for a final sworn affidavit, when I am well enough, to account for my most recent bullying by the South Wales Police. 28th August 2011

Police Steal my Computer and Original Witness Statements to further Pervert the Course of Justice

Imprisonment from 22^nd June 2009 to 9th February 2010

Replica Machine Gun Indictments

1. I, Maurice John Kirk, wish to state that on 23rd August 2011, at 10.20am, was outside Cardiff Central Police Station informing my solicitor as to my newly obtained witness information indicating that South Wales Police had modified prosecution Exhibit 1, a replica WW1 Lewis machine gun, before using it in my 2009 Cardiff Crown Court trial to obtain a mandatory 10 year prison sentence.

2. I was en route to the County Court in relation to my three imminent September Court of Appeal hearings re MAPPA failed disclosure, police ‘shoot to kill' policy and nearly 20 years of malicious prosecutions, false imprisonments and deliberate failure to properly investigate crime committed on me, my family, staff and property associated with my veterinary hospital. The police bullying continues today. I wanted to go onto to my GP due to an ongoing illness, possibly requiring hospitalisation.

3. I entered the police station and asked, for the 4th time in as many weeks, for whoever was in charge of a related 22nd July 2011 incident when I had been interviewed by police following my having recently purchased a fire arm they saw on my website, www.kirkflyingvet.com.

Falsified Psychiatric Reports and ‘Significant Brain Damage'

4. I also asked to see the acting inspector who had taken my 5th July 2011 three hour complaint concerning a Dr Tegwyn Williams telling judges I had ‘significant brain damage', possible brain tumour and too dangerous for release. This related to his questionable association with the South Wales Police using him with his false psychiatric reports to have me locked me up for nearly eight months - clearly because their 'shoot to kill' policy against me had, to date, failed.

Failed MAPPA Disclosure

5. This relationship was further recently revealed in Dr Tegwyn Williams' own leaked MAPPA minutes from Caswell Clinic, Bridgend where police and he or his staff were in attendance at seven of the eight MAPPA meetings. The first MAPPA meeting was held on the 8th June 2009 in Barry police station when the ‘shoot to kill policy' was again agreed.

New Fire Arm Allegation

6. There was again no police officer available to speak to in the police station foyer but, at last, I did manage to obtain the incident's designated ‘occurrence number', thereby identifying police in the purported fire arm investigation.

7. After being refused access to speak to any of those officers, yet again, I asked the female receptionist, behind the plate glass window, whether I would have to shoot the Mayor of Cardiff in order to be able to speak to a police officer?

8. The duty inspector, a Richard Moorcroft, eventually arrived and I asked if I could be shown to an interview room to continue my complaints of 5th July.

Content of New Lincolnshire Witness Statements

9. I outlined the evidence in the new witness statements, some brought with me, which indicate the following and requiring urgent police action:

a. The seized replica machine gun was painted black all over, save the brown wooden stock, when I had sold it in June 2008 and later collected by the owner's wife, on 17th August, at Cardiff airport.

b. Within days of the replica gun arriving at the air museum, in Lincolnshire, it was re-painted, before the new owner bolted it back onto the nose of the DH2 replica aircraft.

c. The distinctive round ammunition magazine was painted, by the new owner, from black to silver.

d. The new owner also stated that the barrel was blocked. He also assumed that it had been part of the original decommissioning carried out in around 1977, to make it legal, before it was attached to the biplane for air displays.

e. The new owner, whilst painting the magazine silver, was witnessed by several in the hangar some of which feature in the new statements.

f. These statements further confirm that when the police seized the replica, on the day of my 22nd June 2009 arrest, the magazine colour was still in silver.

g. About two months later, when reexamined with police in attendance, the new owner states the barrel was no longer blocked, since he had been able to pass a wire from muzzle to breach head. Police told him they had just fired a 410 shot gun cartridge with it.

h. In Cardiff Crown court trial the prosecution had presented a video film, taken from my website, of my carrying the replica in August 2009, just days before its collection by the new owner's wife. The magazine on the replica appeared on the video as black.

i. After the trial, the police returned the replica gun to its owner, but the magazine was now painted back to silver and a picture of such now appears on my website.

10. I explained to the inspector in Cardiff police station that during cross examination of police, in the trial, no one has prepared to account for the exact movements of the replica whilst countless South Wales Police, often single handed, hawked it almost 2000 miles around the United Kingdom in attempts to obtain proof, when I owned the replica, that it contravened the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

11. On his hearing of the new evidence the inspector's face appeared to go white and he left the room, but not without his bound book recording parts of our conversation. The other police officer present also had made notes, both of which may now be difficult to recover.

Arrested for ‘Threats to Kill'

12. At 11am I was arrested for alleged 'threats to kill' (the Mayor of Cardiff!) and taken to Cardiff Bay Police Station cells.

Refused Right to have Someone Notified of my Custody

13. I was refused the right to have someone contacted and informed of my custody promptly. Because of that, the person, whose name and number I gave, did not become aware of the circumstances until nearly two days later and I was unable to bring my witnesses.

Current Medical Condition

14. My current medical condition had worsened with the passing of blood no doubt bleeding from the upper alimentary tract. The doctor who then examined me in custody said I needed further investigation in hospital assuming my release that night. When eventually released and owing to my worsening condition I was, in fact, admitted to hospital and held overnight. I was refused a doctor in the magistrates cell or a nurse.

Oppose Bail to Interfere with Court of Appeal Hearings

15. At 3am the police sergeant refused me bail from their cells reliant on a huge amount of documents, prepared much earlier. I was denied a copy, suggesting I would abscond to France by personally flying out of the country, I presume flaunting all the aviation regulations on the way.

16. Following interrogation through the night on the matter of ‘threats to kill' it was promptly followed by another charge being considered, that of harassment of a Dr Tegwyn Williams. He had made a statement in rebuttal on the 6th July following the approach by police over my written complaint of falsifying my medical evidence the day before. My statement of complaint contained further information to the police that if I was not shot or receive a 10 year prison sentence I would, at least be sent to Broadmoor for life (IPP - Imprisonment for Public Protection). Police continue with their enquiries in order to bring some charge or other.

Refused to take Defendant's Written Statement

17. The police, as with the ‘threats to kill' charge, repeatedly refused to take a written statement from me, when I was trying to avoid any ambiguity of the truth.

Refused Right to Speak to Solicitor or Call Witnesses

18. 27^th August 2011. Having been unable to speak to my witnesses from the police cells, to have them for the hearing, I attempted to speak on the phone to a solicitor from outside the area. I was now transferred to the court cells but was refused a direct confidential telephone call. The solicitor, however, was informed of my custody, but nearly two hours away and without instructions to act.

19. What I did not know, when I entered the court room in hand cuffs, was that the solicitor had spoken, in that short time, to the court and had understood the CPS, during the small hours of the morning, had objected to the ‘threats to kill' charge, clearly only dreamed up by the police to keep me locked up for months, again to affect my ongoing civil proceedings against them.

20. So the police reduced the charge to a Section 4 Public Order offence which, in turn, was again reduced by the prosecutor in court after receiving more facts as to what actually happened.

Refused copy of New Charge

21. I was quickly offered the Section 5 for pleading but refused a copy to read.

Refused Communication with Solicitor

22. I asked to speak to my solicitor, in the sudden change of circumstances but was refused.

Blackmailed to Plead Guilty

23. There was an indication given that, if I pleaded ‘not guilty' the CPS would no longer proceed but if not, I ran the risk of prolonged period on remand again and no early return of my computer and papers - all needed for the Court of Appeal preparation with the hearings due to be heard in September.

24. The police had, I believe, unlawfully taken my court papers and computer from my locked car (after I was arrested) to destroy the original witness statements from Lincolnshire. PC Paul Williams said I could have the computer and court papers back as soon as the ‘threats to kill' case was finalised.

25. I therefore pleaded guilty. But police intrigue appeared again when the CPS then produced a PNC forensic history report on me significantly different to the version that a Derrick Hassan of South Wales Police had prepared for Dr Tegwyn Williams when it went before nine 2009 Cardiff Crown Court judges, considering my bail applications.

26. Mr Derrick Hassan, on 2nd November 20010, had also given evidence, in my absence, (Judicial Review in October), of my committing a ‘common assault', after he had pushed me down the court steps on my crutches which led to my admission to hospital with a suspected fractured leg. A plethora of medical evidence explaining my not attending, accepted by other courts, was withheld from the sitting District Judge.

27. I asked to return to my cell as I was not well but insisted I give mitigation in court once the correct PNC printout had been established (for my private prosecution against Dr Williams, the papers currently with the Recorder of Cardiff and Cardiff Magistrates, for too many weeks now, to list for a hearing). I left the court and asked the custody officer in charge to ensure the court knew I had changed my plea to ‘not guilty' as my Court of Appeal and bail was paramount.

28. I returned to the cells to be informed later I had received a £50 fine in my absence. I also now had time to read prosecution papers sent in by duty solicitor indicating even the two statements of receptionist and Inspector Moorcroft contradicted the main issue and the latter having written I had admitted the offence of ‘threats to kill'!

PC Paul Williams withholds Computer and Witness Statements

29. On release I rang the police officer with the computer who was amazed I had pleaded ‘guilty', expecting to have the computer bag withheld for months, just like during the machine gun case, anything to prolong the unaccountable police bullying.

30. He reluctantly agreed to return the contents of my computer case, but on my arrival at the police station he refused to return the computer, scanner, camera accessories etc and Lincolnshire statements offering only an empty bag. He demanded a signature for it or I could not have the empty bag.

31. This then led to a scuffle fighting over the empty bag requiring some eleven police officers filling the Cardiff Bay Police Station foyer until I eventually managed to pull off them without the need for a signature.

Here's a message from a Police Officer after Maurice was arrested on the "support blog".

To be continued after I have next visited the police station to demand my property back, including original witness statements.

New Evidence South Wales Police Fabricated My Machine Gun Trial

Maurice — Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:37:00 GMT

In the next hour I am publishing the situation in the UK, as I see it, I hasten to add, of just how people like Norman Scarth RN Rtd with an excessive prison sentence and totally frustrated as to how the criminals in our courts are so protected by Royal Charters, the Musa family with six children stolen by Haringey Council, Vicky Haigh denied her child and many others who are all at the mercy of 'HM Partnership', based on completely outdated Royal Charters, one of which, the 1966 Veterinary Surgeons Act, has blocked my right to practice veterinary surgery for the rest of my life.

The daily deceit and intrigue, ignoring all basic principles of law, going on in our courts, by those supposedly in charge cross the country, has become quite intolerable.

Just for starters:

This following statement to an apparently deaf and dumb appendage of our current government as to where the problem lies, is a stark reminder of things to come. It will be the indigenous part of our population, next time, that will rise to arms and cause blood on our streets.

Duty Inspector,
The Metropolitan Police,
New Scotland Yard,
London SW1H 0BG

21st August 2011

Dear Sir,

Complaint against South Wales Police

I wish to submit a complaint against the South Wales Police for perverting the course of justice and their attempt to having me shot, as attempted murder, by their own armed police unit, ‘defending' the then, Chief Constable, Ms Barbara Wilding, claiming I was eligible for MAPPA level 3, terrorist status..

Do I also make a further complaint to my French police as they are already aware of the serious situation documented in my asylum application papers, shortly to be heard in the Paris court?

Further to my detailed 63 page witness statement I enclose my latest one which contains new evidence. This indicates police officers tampered with my WWI decommissioned Lewis machine gun after it was sold in order that it could discharge a live round. Hence it would appear I was in breach of the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

Evidence from refused prosecution disclosure, prior and during the 2009 Cardiff trial and that obtained by cross examination, further indicates this week's new evidence:

A significant number of police officers of high rank are implicated. There are many eye witnesses to support my statement.

I request urgent action, as my life may still be in danger.

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to Alun Cairns MP

Puits aux Papillions
St Doha, 22230 Merdrignac , France

www.kirkflyingvet.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Telephone: UK 07907937953 Brittany 0033296258451

http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/11-08-21-mg-11-mjk-witness-statement-final.pdf

Send the Musa Family back Home to Nigeria - WITH their Children!
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/send-the-musa-family-back-home-to-nigeria-with-their.html

I have just spoken to Rear Admiral Sir Norman Scarth Rtd in Leeds Prison

Maurice — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:06:00 GMT

I spoke to Norman
on the phone this morning for the first time. Well, I say I spoke but it was a little unorthodox and makes the prison tape recording of him for the CPS, HMCS and Ashworth high security psychiatric prison, just down the road, all the more farcical.

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/images/2092/640x480.aspx

http://victimsunite.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/11-08-09-free-norman-a5.pdf

I was ringing one of Norman's many girl friends to hammer home the importance of the situation that the enemy will cheat and lie to get him sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act and not to let what we are all doing, to help, go ‘pear shaped'. If the ‘right hand' does not know what the ‘left' is doing, in our combined fight, they may succeed in serving the 'Gulag Card' or worse, without a shot being fired and we may never see the cantankerous old bugger again..

Video: A Den of Evil - Maurice Kirk & Norman Scarth in court 28/6/2011

"When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right" Voltaire misquote

As I was talking from Brittany, this morning, a mobile rang on the other end of my phone only for me to hear Norman listing his complaints to the caller ringing my recipient! So we had a 4 way conversation, Norman, standing in a noisy landing on ‘D' wing, no doubt, continually being jogged and wrestled with from a queue of prisoners, to get him off the phone line.

Readers may not understasnd very few minutes are allotted to prisoners phoning out which, together with the short inconvenient times they even get access to a phone, it is all part of the usual ‘gravy train' tactics HM Partnership use to deliberately hinder a litigant in person......which is why all of you must process private prosecutions. Well we victims also have partnerships!

Norman is being refused medication, prescribed before he entered prison, his appeal procedure is being delayed, I suspect deliberately, and every trick is being used, as I have experienced soooo many times, to blackmail the litigant to use a lawyer, so often a complete stranger. Norman is cold, tired, in pain and angry, but they will not crack that ‘nut', that is for sure.

But they do not have to, please understand, Norman runs the real risk of the enemy employing another Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, South Wales, to completely fabricate psychiatric reports to send him down, unconvicted, for life using the likes of Cardiff Judge, Paul Thomas QC, evilness personified.

The demonstration at the Leeds prison on the 13^thAugust, at 10 am, BE THERE!

McKenzie Angels are for all the others as well, also locked up on fabricated psychiatric reports by evil doctors who, like too many Welsh judges I have experienced, who are, apparently, also only answerable to no one but Their Maker.

Violence is just around the corner, whether I approve or not. Anarchy within the judiciary will not be tolerated by the general public for very much longer.

As a foot note of ‘what really goes on in our courts', Norman was ejected just previous to this hearing, please read part of my opening of the scandalous ‘machine gun trial', on 25 January and 27 January 2009, transcribed by the CPS, during its first few day, to jail Nadia, later in the proceedings for her second protest from the public gallery.

Nadia would be the first to approve of this old saying of mine:

The full 12 day trial will be published, shortly, together with part of my 19 year running civil hearing for damages against the South Wales Police. The bill to pay for it is just short of £10,000 highlighting one of the factors in HM Conspiratorial Partnership ‘treacle treatment': to finally break anyone, like Norman Scarth RN Rtd, who dares question the UK tax payer financed utterly corrupt and antiquated adversarial system.

{Circa 1984, on my Guernsy surgery wall... thoughts sprayed on by an antibiotic large animal spray! I was running the Guernsey Legal Aid Association, at the time, that really got up their filthy noses.}

Extracts of the first two days of 2009 Cardiff Machine Gun Trial appear here: 25 January and 27 January 2009.

PS. His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, the so called 'Recorder of Cardiff', whatever that is to imply, had Norman ejected from my 1st OCT 2009 Crown Court.

THE TRANSCRIPT, BELOW, IS ALL ABOUT NORMAN AND THE VERY SERIOUS DANGER HE IS NOW IN TO BE SECTIONED JUST AS COOKE ACHIEVED WITH ME BUT SO APTLY 'CAUGHT ON HIS OWN TAPE RECORDER'!!!!

EVIL DESPICABLE DECEITFUL COOKE, LYING CPS, THOMLOW AND FRUSTRATED NORMAN ALL KNEW DR TEGWYN WILLIAMS HAD FALSIFIED THAT PSYCHIATRIC REPORT FOR THE SOUTH WALES POLICE BUT WHICH ONE TRIED TO HELP?

PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE COOKE AND CPS CONDUCT, IT IS GOING ON ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND NORMAN, NADIA AND MY DAUGHTER, BELINDA AND MANY OTHER FRIENDS, SOME FROM MANY MILES AWAY, WERE THERE TO WiTNESSES THE DAILY STENCH THAT EXUDES FROM CARDIFF CROWN COURT 1st Oct 2009 Cardiff Crown Court hearing.

I was, at the time, quietly asking for bail against a Welsh judiciary conspiracy also desperate to get me to Ashworth due to my civil cases for damages. NOW Cooke refuses the Bristol English judge, following my private prosecution, this year, laying of information the English judge advising me that the 'apparent' criminal conduct by Dr Tegwyn Williams, South Wales Police and others, all controlling the Welsh media, should go back to Norman's favourite Welsh judge and get him to 'bloody well get it sorted out'!

But, as Dad would so often say at dinner table, some of these people in jumped up positions of responsibility 'simply cannot stand corn'.

Can you help by getting this posted on every site and asking all your friends to do the same? We need hundreds to turn out on Saturday. We need all your friends to phone the media – TV, radio – newpapers all over the country. THIS IS A VERY BIG STORY. Thank you so much for offering to help. We all need to work 24/7 on this right up until Saturday, and then start phoning the local TV stations and newspapers and the BBC. We need everyone to do this. He is in serious danger.

Proper press releases will be going out later from Leeds. But this is what we all need to be focused on all week. If you have any military connections – get the troops out on the parade ground – Royal Legions – all the military groups, e.g. Help for Heroes.

I watched this purported first daughter of mine set off from HMS Belfast (Cruiser with Norman on flying bridge of HMS Standfast at the December 1943 sinking of the Battle Cruiser Scharnhorst), last year, to row right around Great Britain to raise money for Help the Heroes. Much more from the skipper on http://belindakirk.co.uk/

They must highlight how Britain is treating a veteran. Uniforms are good or beret and blazers and medals. This is a very serious matter. We also need lots of senior citizens.

(Dig out any old machine guns you can find!)

Short of .303 or 9mm ammo? Then ring 0790 793 7953 and ask for Lulu.

Phone the prison every day: 0113-203-2600 Governor Rob Kellett

People really must make the effort to be there, no matter where they live.

TO ALL GROUPS FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE AND TRUTH IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UK – SPREAD THE WORD TODAY - URGENT

FREE NORMAN SCARTH DEMONSTRATION

ALL HANDS ON DECK REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE RELEASE OF WWII NAVY VETERAN, AND POLITICAL PRISONER, NORMAN SCARTH

There will be peaceful and lawful demonstration and rally in support of decorated World War II veteran, 85 year old Norman Scarth. Norman was imprisoned for six months on July 25th 2011 for making a recording of a court hearing. Norman’s barrister apologised on Norman’s behalf when Norman returned to court, but he was sentenced to an excessive six months in a prison for serious offenders, regardless. Since then, he was only allowed one phone call, and is being denied all visitors; his conditions could be described as torturous as he been denied exercise.

He has been told that either he walks for a full hour or not at all. He is unable to walk for a full hour – he is an 85 year old man with health problems. He is cold at night and sleeps in his clothing.

We feel the sentence is excessive, cruel, and inhumane for an 86 year old man with health problems, who has been fighting for our freedom, not only during World War II, when his heroic acts helped keep Britain free, but on a regular daily basis for many, many years, with his efforts to bring truth, justice, and transparency into the UK Courts and legal system and to highlight the corruption. It is a serious human rights issue.

Leeds Prison is a prison for serious offenders. Whereas, once, the demographics of this prison were predominantly that of serious offenders in their 30s, the population is now dominated by senior citizens. Who is sending them there?

Norman has been fighting for our freedom and now we have to fight for his! It is imperative that there is a massive turn out.

TIME: 10.00 a.m.
DATE: Saturday, August 13, 2011

Leeds Prison
2 Gloucester Terrace, Stanningley Road
Leeds
West Yorkshire LS12 2TJ

Paid parking on site.

Map: http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&q=2+Gloucester+Terrace+LS12+2TJ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&biw=1502&bih=648&wrapid=tlif131246062776121&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x48795eb8caf40d63:0xdc5a17a6c04e7797,Gloucester+Terrace,+Leeds+LS12+2,+UK&gl=ca&ei=d486TtT_K4HeiAKYlYm2Dg&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ8gEwAARide the Double-Decker Demonstration Bus from 43 Main Street, Greetham, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 7NJ. Map: http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&rlz=&q=43+Main+Street,+Greetham,+Oakham,+Rutland,+LE15+7NJ&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x487828377c86ff25:0xb9901a91ae7e420,43+Main+St,+Greetham,+Oakham,+Rutland+LE15+7NJ,+UK&gl=ca&ei=tJE6ToSZJ7HSiALvkpW2Dg&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ8gEwAA
There is plenty of street parking. Look for the big red bus. Bus leaves sharp at 7.00 a.m. and can pick up people enroute, if prearranged with Paul Talbot-Jenkins fame_97@hotmail.com

RESERVATIONS REQUIRED

Please bring placards to support the release of Norman Scarth, and video cameras if possible.
For information on how to reserve a seat on the bus, or make a donation regardless, contact Paul Talbot at fame_97@hotmail.com. There is a donation request of 5 to 10 pounds towards expenses. Donations can also be sent by Paypal to fame_97@hotmail.com. You can put it on your credit card and it will be transmitted instantly, and with complete security via Paypal. www.paypal.com

Any surplus will be given to Norman for his comfort fund while in prison, or whatever he may need. He has to pay for every phone call and many other things. Please help Norman in any way that you can. Donations can also be mailed to Paul Talbot at 43 main Street, Greetham, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 7NJ.

MEDIA: For media package and information, please contact Chris Jarvis at chris@socialservicehell.org or Jean James at jeanjames@telus.net

MEDIA CONTACTS AT THE EVENT: Chris Jarvis: chris@socialservicehell.org and Gwen gwenjpv@hotmail.co.uk

For more about Norman Scarth, please see the following:

MAGNA CARTA DAY - Leeds 15th June 2011
Norman Scarth fighting for Liberty & Freedom!!

Norman Scarth (no. 27 of over 30 victim stories)

WRITE LETTERS OF SUPPORT TO NORMAN, USING HIS PRISONER NUMBER IN THE ADDRESS

READ THE RULES ON THE PRISON WEBSITE BEFORE SENDING
http://www.insidetime.org/info-regimes2.asp?nameofprison=HMP_LEEDS

SEND HUNDREDS OF LETTERS AND MAKE HUNDREDS OF PHONE CALLS TO THE PRISON
Mr. Norman Scarth, Prisoner Number A1903CF, D WING 240
Leeds Prison
2 Gloucester Terrace
Stanningley Road
Leeds LS12 2TJ

Phone 0113-203-2600 Governor Rob Kellett

Or Email a Prisoner, mentioning A1903CF.

Dear Sirs: Please help Norman, and ask all your members to come to the event detailed at the end of this communication. We need a big show of support from military and ex military.20,000 returning veterans are currently housed in HM prisons, because they are not getting the psychiatric counselling that is required when they return from war zones. Now we find out that veterans, such as 85 year old Norman Scarth are being abused. Please read all and go full steam ahead.

Respectfully, Jean James

Sent to government and c.c.
Mr. Nick Hardwick HM Inspector of Prisons
c.c. Dr. Peter Selby
c.c. Ms. Maggie Woods, HMPS Healthcare Manager, Leeds Prison
c.c. Prisons and Probations Ombudsman
c.c. Ann Lavery, NHS Leeds

IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST - PRISON ABUSES – REQUEST FOR PUBLIC INQUIRY- JUSTICE AND PRISON REFORM- TRANSPARENCY IN THE COURTS- human rights – elder abuse- nhs

On CRANMER - Examining Religio-Political Agendas with Politico-Religious Objectives
Monday, August 08, 2011
Norman Scarth, 85-year-old war hero, abused at Her Majesty’s pleasure:

His Grace heard vaguely of the case of Norman Scarth some weeks ago. Apparently, Mr Scarth recorded a court hearing, and was subsequently jailed for six months for doing so. We are not in the United States of America, where court hearings are not only routinely recorded but broadcast on primetime TV as light entertainment: this is the United Kingdom, where the court room is the judge’s private fiefdom and where the cameras may not flash at all. All visual depictions are by in-house sketch artists whose work is interpretive. Court proceedings are, of course, recorded by the courts, so it’s not as though every word isn’t made available. But you’ll have to pay several hundred pounds for a copy of the transcript (with no way of knowing if the content has been redacted).

For whatever reason, Norman Scarth, a naval war veteran who helped defeat the forces of Fascism and Nazism, decided to make a covert audio recording of a particular hearing. His Grace doesn’t know why, but neither is he concerned: Mr Scarth broke the law; of that there is no doubt. But six months incarceration for an 85-year-old is rather like subjecting Oscar Wilde to a few years' hard labour: it breaks the man. And when you consider that some of our former MPs who fiddled the taxpayer of tens of thousands of pounds were sentenced to less, there is slight disquiet and sense of disproportionality.

Like millions of Europeans today, Mr Scarth is dissatisfied (an understatement) with the powers that be and with the increasing loss of freedom and democracy. And it appears he has form. Two years ago a senior judge branded him a ‘sordid public nuisance’ who shouted ‘anything, however offensive, insulting, threatening, racist, homophobic, sexist, or downright barmy’ in order to get a local election result overturned. Richard Mawrey QC told him that he was a ‘crazed old man’ who subjected voters to ‘manic abuse’: Judge Mawrey described Mr Scarth as a man convinced he was the victim of a conspiracy, which was tested further upon conviction of wounding in 2001 and served four years in prison, followed by two years in a psychiatric hospital.

He said: “In Mr Scarth’s universe he is the noble fighter for justice and the rule of law who, despite appalling levels of official persecution, has refused to be silenced and continues the struggle, bloody but unbowed. In the real world, inhabited by the rest of us, Mr Scarth is a disturbed, clearly paranoid and occasionally violent old man who is a persistent minor public irritant.” And so we are in the intractable dichotomy of one side believing that the politicians, police and courts are overly authoritarian, subverting democracy and limiting freedom, while the other contends that the state authorities are upholding democracy in the righteous exercise of power.

His Grace would like to remind Richard Mawrey QC of the words of Lord Justice Sedley on 23rd July 1999, who championed the rights of people to express their views, and quoted Socrates and two famous Quakers in doing so. There is no breach of the peace if what is said is merely offensive. Lord Justice Sedley said: “Free speech includes not only the offensive, but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative, providing it does not tend to provoke violence.”

The world has seen too many examples of state control and censorship of unofficial utterances. Mr Scarth may well be offensive, irritating, contentious, eccentric, heretical, unwelcome and provocative, but it is His Grace’s judgement that society is all the better for such people: freedom reigns while they spout their views. We draw the line at prejudice, irrational discrimination or incitement to violence. Or we used to, before Labour introduced the concept of ‘hate speech’.

That aside, His Grace has been informed that Mr Scarth is having a hard time of it. His friends and supporters are becoming increasingly concerned for his wellbeing and safety. His Grace will set aside the irrational ramblings of his treatment being akin to a ‘gulag’ or ‘worse than the gas chambers’, for such absurd hyperbole does not help the cause. As we know, the blogosphere is replete with all that is hyped-up, exaggerated, fabricated and distorted.

The issue here is that Norman Scarth is apparently being treated inhumanely. While we bend over backwards to accommodate Islamic prayers and keep bacon off the menu; while we free the Lockerbie-bombing mass murderer on compassionate grounds; while we rush out to buy Kentucky Fried Chicken for escaped prisoners encamped on the prison roof – all to preserve their inviolable ‘human rights’ – we incarcerate our own war veterans with little regard for their humanity and dignity. Mr Scarth clearly believes that he is serving his country by his actions: the prison authorities are allegedly depriving him of medication and torturing him by keeping him in solitary confinement in a cold cell and forcing him to exercise for an hour every day or not at all. At 85, an hour of exercise is beyond his physical ability.

Mr Scarth is due to spend Christmas behind bars, and not scheduled for release until 25th January 2012. Here is his address should you wish to write to him:

Prisoner A1903CF
D-Wing 240
2 Gloucester Terrace
Stanningley Road
Leeds
LS12 2TJ

His Grace is informed that the prison authorities filter the mail, so it cannot be overly political in nature (though it is not at all clear what must be censored). He is also informed that the only politician to have shown any interest in this case is the Liberal Democrat John Hemming MP. Good for him. We are constantly told that our prisons are so bursting at the seams and that we must consider plea-bargaining and early release for murderers, rapists and paedophiles. And yet this frail, old man is doing time because he recording a court hearing. Was there really no alternative?

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2011/08/norman-scarth-85-year-old-war-hero.html

Norman Scarth: An Open Letter to His ‘Honour’ Judge Jonathan Rose
An open letter TO HIS ‘HONOUR’ JUDGE JONATHAN ROSE
Martin Narey, Director General of the Prison Service, wrote of “HELL HOLE PRISONS”.

HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, Sir David Ramsbottom spoke on the Frost programme of ‘BARBARIC PRISON GUARDS’. See his book PRISONGATE.

A DEFINITION OF HELL: Solitary Confinement for 23 ½ hours a day, lying on my bunk staring at the bunk above only 12¨ above my head, unable to sit up in bed. (as doctor’s orders). Nothing to read, nothing to write on, no watch, no radio, nothing to do but stare at the rotten stinking TV pumping out brainwashing garbage. (“Live in luxury with colour TV” says the so-called “News Media”) That IS Hell!! Bad enough for anyone but for WW2 ‘Hero’ (as others have called me) who has worked honestly & hard for 70 years it is TORMENT!The previous HMCIP Judge Sir Steven TUMIN told of people being sent to prison “BY SOME SLIMY JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE” (He “DIED SUDDENLY”).

MY CRIME? I had on me a ‘RECORDING DEVICE’ (as do ALL those with a mobile phone, ALL of which have a recording device. But I dared to switch mine on before asking permission of the judge. Why did I do so? It is my belief that there are many rotten apples in the judiciary, and for the last 15 years it has been my mission in life to expose them. It has been THEIR mission to silence me – by ANY MEANS, including potentially lethal terror attacks (as on 8th August 1999 & 20 July 2000).

As part of my mission I stood for Parliament & published the book ‘Cause for Concern’ in 1997. However, I was still regarded as a noisy old buffoon, a Parliamentary no-hoper. This changed after my single-handed success in the ECtHR brought a vital change in British law incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights Act. The change is much hated (by) lawyers & judges – AND I AM HATED FOR IT. Just 17 DAYS after the ECtHR decision came an attack on 8th Aug 1999. It was intended to silence me by fear, a heart attack or stroke the hoped for outcome. Few men of my age (73 then) would not have one or the other. However, I survived, so 11 months later there was a second attack during which I was given a brutal kicking that put me in hospital. To cover up these crimes there was a malicious prosecution for a NON-EXISTENT ‘crime’.

Where others would have been given Probation, Community Service or Suspended Sentence, I was given TEN YEARS! – the intention being that I would die in prison. The horror became worse but I skip that for now. Sufficient to say that I did not succumb to the torment & torture, but survived long enough to have ‘PAID MY DEBT TOSOCIETY’(?). AFTER 7 YEARS, I WAS RELEASED.

However, I have continued my mission to expose the rotten apples in the judiciary & am STILL under attack because of it – physical & financial!Their hatred of me is proved by the savagery of the 10 year sentence & the savagery of this sentence. “It’s only 6 months”. AT 85 how many 6 months periods do I have left?

THIS IS WHAT DRIVES PEOPLE TO TAKE THEIR OWN LIVES. IT IS A VILE FORM OF MURDER. I INTENDED to ask Jonathan Rose for permission to use my recorder but did not get the opportunity to do so. Why DID I switch it on? I suspected there might be skulduggery during that case. We are told that only those doing wrong need fear CCTV cameras. Why then are judges so TERRIFIED of being recorded. There is much more to this story, but the fact is that anybody in (the) land can commit ANY crime against me with impunity, but if I blink an eye I will be stamped on with savagery. So far the stamping has not been as that on Andy McCardle.

No addresses or telephone numbers of friends or barrister. THE VITAL DOCUMENTS TO BE POSTED TO APPEAL COURT HAVE DISAPPEARED. THIS IS MENTAL TORTURE. NORMAN SCARTH

PS. It has ‘only’ been 72 hours so far, but at 85 every single day is precious to me, especially for the VITAL work I have to do to prevent Britain becoming even more of a POLICE STATE than it is now. The present excitement about the Olympics is reminiscent of Berlin in 1936. To keep the people distracted from the horror behind the scenes. “The Opium of the Masses” said Karl Marx. He said it about Religion, now it is SPORT

Monday 1st August 2011. Tomorrow I SHOULD be keeping an appointment at BRI (Hospital) but they refuse to take me. Got the first sheet of paper on Wed 27th July. Got this one Sat 31st. No stamps or envelopes until Sat 7th Aug, so will be unable to post this before 9th Aug. IF they get it before 10th Aug it will be because I have managed to scrounge them from other prisoners.

Please send copies of these documents to: My legal consultant xxx xxxxxxx who is a Human Rights Specialist. My Consultant Psychiatrist Dr Paul Beavan (Bevan?) & Psychiatric Nurse Helen Poulter at Lynfield Mount Hospital: to Neil Craig at the Royal Hotel, Low Moor, & to THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. Stamps sent in for me have been sent back to the sender. A blank card with a stamp affixed has been given to me, but the stamp has been torn off. That is THIEVERY!

Please adopt the slogan HELP for Heroes. Get on to that organisation & DEMAND they do something dramatic NOW! If they do not, then they must hang their heads in shame forever more. 6 months at 85 is equal to 15 YEARS for a younger man. Visiting Order enclosed. It says “CONCERNED OR WORRIED ABOUT A FRIEND AT HMP LEEDS? Ring 0113 203 2972.”

Please ask the WHOLE WORLD to do so. Please copy the Complaint Form & send it to the prison. My hands are in cramp and I CANNOT write everything out again even if I can get the paper. This is a death camp. They drive people to take their own lives, then they call it ‘SUICIDE’. Please be quick. I think they will send me to a prison far away suffering the TORTURE of prison vans. With no flesh on my buttocks & very low seats my thighs make no contact, all the weight on my seat bones. I have already put in a Complaint at the seizing of the envelope with the bundle of documents which were to be posted to the Court of Appeal. That is Obstructing / Perverting the Course of Justice – a crime subject to LIFE IMPRISONMENT.

“JUDGE” Jonathan Rose was acting in GROSS breach of his own Judicial Oath & that of the Queen (in whose name he purports to act) who swore before ALMIGHTY GOD to Deliver JUSTICE with MERCY. He was thus MASQUERADING as a judge and ‘Obtaining money (his salary) by false pretences.

I am forced to sleep in my clothes as I am very cold (a symptom of shock?). I do suffer from agonising cramp & have been prescribed tablets for it, but am denied them here. See the ‘United Kingdom Standard Minimum Treatment for Prisoners 1984(?). Demand that the prison doctor reads them. I can post without a stamp, but it goes 2nd Class ONLY TO BE TOLD THAT TODAY MON 1st AUG!! But I can only remember a few addresses anyway.

Please thank Sabine McNeill for her WONDERFUL letter. Get on to Patrick Cullinane & remind him (of) our conversation at Harrow. NEIL CRAIG at Royal Hotel, Low Moor might be best man to get on to ‘HELP FOR HEROES’. Demand that they do something for THIS Hero.

Can you please send me a copy of the report in the Telegraph & Argus.Short URL: http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=24552
http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=24552&cpage=1#comment-318258
PILOT ONLY MINISTRY OF JUSTICE PRISONER’S FORMAL COMPLAINT (Please send a copy to the prison. I have cramp in my writing hand & CANNOT write it out again. I am prescribed tablets for the cramp, but denied them here.)

Your Details SCARTH NORMAN A1903CF D WING 240

Who did you speak to about your complaint and what was the outcome? Several prison officers. It WAS registered as an official complaint, but not a word since.

Your complaint I dare not take a shower, the last time here (2003 or 2004?) several laughing, jeering officers attacked me with a fire hose, trying to knock me to the ground. Then 78/79 I was able to keep my feet, but doubt I could do so at 85. Unable to take a shower I have decided to make a DIRTY PROTEST, though I will not be smearing excreta on the walls. As I am on a starvation diet there is little in my alimentary tract anyway. I ask that the Prison Doctor should read ‘The UN Minimum Standards of Treatment of Prisoners 1984(?).

Is your complaint about violent or threatening behaviour? Yes Is your complaint about discrimination, harassment or victimisation related to one of the legally protected characteristics (these are: age: disability, race, sex, religion, transgender, sexual orientation) If yes, please explain why within your complaint

What would you like to see done about your complaint? That those who attacked me be prosecuted, &, if there is even a pretence of ‘justice’ in Britain, will be sent to prison – without any keys! N Scarth

2nd Aug 2011

Cameron pushes to recognise Arctic Convoy Veterans ·
The British prime minister has said Arctic convoy veterans, who delivered supplies which kept the Soviet Union going during World War II, should get medals. This would bring the UK oin line with Russia which honoured British veterans last year. David Cameron said they endured "incredibly harsh conditions" while escorting supplies to ports in the Arctic Circle between 1941 and 1945. Winston Churchill described the convoys as the most dangerous of the war.Last year the Russian government presented medals to scores of veterans who attended receptions in London.In one ceremony in May on board HMS Belfast - which took part in the convoys - the then Ambassador of the Russian Federation, Yuri Fedotov, said the medals were a sign of Russia's appreciation for the veterans' heroic deeds.Many of the Arctic convoy veterans were merchant seamen, rather than Royal Navy servicemen, and served aboard 1,400 merchant ships which were pressed into service.Supplies of British and American military equipment - everything from bullets to tanks and planes - enabled the Red Army to stay in the war and fend off the Germans until the battle of Stalingrad, when the tide was turned.Thousands of British sailors were killed as their ships were picked off by U-boats which harried the Arctic convoys.Mr Cameron told the House of Commons he had been in contact with the Ministry of Defence about the medals idea.He said: "Of course you have to have proper rules here, but it seems to me that the important fact is that the people on the Arctic convoys served under incredibly harsh conditions and weren't actually allowed to serve for very long periods of time."There is a case for saying they have missed out. Many of them are coming to (the) end of their lives and it would be good if we could do something more to recognise what they have done."Mr Cameron was responding to Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative MP for Gosport in Hampshire, who had asked if there were plans to honour the veterans.She said: "I know you understand there is a huge amount of support for the Arctic convoy veterans of World War II to receive a medal."But do you appreciate that in order for the remaining representatives of this incredibly brave group of men to receive this recognition in their lifetime that the time to act is now?"Ambassador Fedotov with Embassy staff and British veterans aboard HMS Belfast May 2010 http://www.bsr-russia.com/en/international-relations/item/1487-cameron-pushes-to-recognise-arctic-convoy-veterans.html

FOLLOW NORMAN SCARTH ON TWITTER @FreeNorman

TO ALL GROUPS FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE AND TRUTH IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UK SPREAD THE WORD TODAY -

URGENT FREE NORMAN SCARTH DEMONSTRATION ALL HANDS ON DECK REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE RELEASE OF WWII NAVY VETERAN, AND POLITICAL PRISONER, NORMAN SCARTH

There will be peaceful and lawful demonstration and rally in support of decorated Arctic Convoy World War II veteran, 85 year old Norman Scarth. Norman was imprisoned for six months on July 26th 2011 for making a recording of a court hearing. Norman’s barrister apologised on Norman’s behalf when Norman returned to court, but he was sentenced to an excessive six months in a prison for serious offenders, regardless. He has been denied his medications, and is in solitary confinement. He has no access to pens and paper, and any stamps that people have sent him are being stolen by the staff. His unable to sit up in bed because the bunk above him is so close to his face that it is not possible. He has no reading material, and no one to talk to. He has been told that either he walks for a full hour or not at all. He is unable to walk for a full hour – he is an 85 year old man with health problems. He is cold at night and sleeps in his clothing. We feel the sentence is excessive, cruel, and inhumane for an almost 86 year old man with health problems, who has been fighting for our freedom, not only during World War II, when his heroic acts helped keep Britain free, but on a regular daily basis for many, many years, with his efforts to bring truth, justice, and transparency into the UK Courts and legal system and to highlight the corruption. It is a serious human rights issue, and it is taking place in Her Majesty’s prison. Leeds Prison is a prison for serious offenders. Whereas, once, the demographics of this prison were predominantly that of serious offenders in their 30s, the population is now dominated by senior citizens. Who is sending them there? In Norman’s case, it was Judge Jonathan Rose, Bradford Combined Courts, Yorkshire. Norman has been fighting for our freedom and now we have to fight for his! It is imperative that there is a massive turn out!

TIME: 10.00 a.m.

DATE: Saturday, August 13, 2011

Leeds Prison
2 Gloucester Terrace, Stanningley Road
Leeds
West Yorkshire LS12 2TJ Paid parking on site.

Map: http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&q=2+Gloucester+Terrace+LS12+2TJ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&biw=1502&bih=648&wrapid=tlif131246062776121&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x48795eb8caf40d63:0xdc5a17a6c04e7797,Gloucester+Terrace,+Leeds+LS12+2,+UK&gl=ca&ei=d486TtT_K4HeiAKYlYm2Dg&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ8gEwAA

Ride the Double-Decker Demonstration Bus from 43 Main Street, Greetham, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 7NJ. Map: http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&rlz=&q=43+Main+Street,+Greetham,+Oakham,+Rutland,+LE15+7NJ&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x487828377c86ff25:0xb9901a91ae7e420,43+Main+St,+Greetham,+Oakham,+Rutland+LE15+7NJ,+UK&gl=ca&ei=tJE6ToSZJ7HSiALvkpW2Dg&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ8gEwAA

There is plenty of street parking. Look for the big red bus. Bus leaves sharp at 7.00 a.m. and can pick up people enroute, if prearranged with Paul Talbot-Jenkins fame_97@hotmail.com

RESERVATIONS REQUIRED

Please bring placards to support the release of Norman Scarth, and video cameras if possible. For information on how to reserve a seat on the bus, or make a donation regardless, contact Paul Talbot at fame_97@hotmail.com. There is a donation request of 5 to 10 pounds towards expenses. Donations can also be sent by Paypal to fame_97@hotmail.com. You can put it on your credit card and it will be transmitted instantly, and with complete security via Paypal. www.paypal.com Any surplus will be given to Norman for his comfort fund while in prison, or whatever he may need. He has to pay for every phone call and many other things. Please help Norman in any way that you can. Donations can also be mailed to Paul Talbot at 43 main Street, Greetham, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 7NJ. MEDIA: For media package and information, please contact Chris Jarvis at chris@socialservicehell.org or Jean James at jeanjames@telus.net

MEDIA CONTACTS AT THE EVENT: Chris Jarvis: chris@socialservicehell.org and Gwen gwenjpv@hotmail.co.uk For more about Norman Scarth, please see the following: http://freedomnorthwest.socialgo.com/videos/view/magna-carta-day---leeds-15th-june-2011-norman-scarth-_515.html?m=125http://victims-unite.net/our-cases-as-stories/violent-physical-attacks/norman-scarth/

WRITE LETTERS OF SUPPORT TO NORMAN, USING HIS PRISONER NUMBER IN THE ADDRESS READ THE RULES ON THE PRISON WEBSITE BEFORE SENDING

http://www.insidetime.org/info-regimes2.asp?nameofprison=HMP_LEEDS

SEND HUNDREDS OF LETTERS AND MAKE HUNDREDS OF PHONE CALLS TO THE PRISON

Mr. Norman Scarth, Prisoner Number A1903CF, D WING 240
Leeds Prison
2 Gloucester Terrace
Stanningley Road
Leeds LS12 2TJ

Phone 0113-203-2600 Governor Rob Kellett

Just how Incestuous can this Cardiff Court get? QC, Solicitor or Judge to be Arrested on Monday? [Can o fwydod]

Maurice — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:46:00 GMT

On Monday, at 2pm, 11^th July, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre my machine gun/false psychiatric reports, damages claim starts, having been refused a jury or it being transferred to England. They are for South Wales Police's unlawful attempts to having me jailed my life, unconvicted and attempting to have my 10 year old daughter ‘taken into care' by the Welsh courts, NHS and Welsh Social Services.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has already ‘struck out' an incident when police were caught on their own overhead road video [see website You Tube], beating me up in a Cardiff street and, later, in police cells and another incident he knows about, when the police withdrew reason for arrest aka ‘Breach of the Peace'. This judge ruled, "damages cannot be claimed against police if, after each incident complained of, you happen to pick up some criminal conviction, however trivial, whether related or not!"

This same judge, would you believe, has already refused to accept some 130 odd allegations, lost by the police, winning only around 12, is not an extreme example of police bullying !. He has ruled the first five Actions for damages will not be heard together, transfered to the High Court or will get a jury.

South Wales Police will be asking the same judge these latest damages claims, that caused me over seven months imprisonment, including three months of shear hell in Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, must be adjourned for at least 5 years to allow the previous 5 Actions be heard, appealed and disposed of in their usual perfunctory way.

This Cardiff Cabal, of deceit and intrigue, have already managed to delay my 1st Action for damges for 19 years, my solicitor dying meantime, with key witnesses now either settled in old people's homes, senile or dead.

Come witness this judge block the recorded evidence of a criminal conspiracy by South Wales Police high ranking officers, in Barry police station and Caswell Clinic recorded in their own MAPPA minutes using the excuse it falls under PII, ie not in the public interest!

It stinks, doesnt it?

I am off the morphine so come witness real criminals being arrested, to eventually face private prosecutions by the people, their ‘Achilles Heel'.

Copy to HHJJ Seys Llewellyn 10^th July 2011

Dear Mr Oliver and His Honour Seys Llewellyn,

The Criminal Prosecution of Dr Tegwyn Williams and Merging all twenty years grievances into a case that Judges then approve to hear before a Jury in England

We refer to the letter 27 June 2011 regards case management hearing 11 & 12 July should not go ahead if the plan is to prevent fair trial, by not allowing access to justice of the opportunity to list all twenty years grievances into a case where selected issues of the twenty years can then go before a Court preferably before a jury.

We apologise to Mr Oliver for confusion in how the original transcript of letters (and specifically the letter 23 June 2001) on behalf of Mr Kirk are added to by many volunteers. I hope we can clarify as follows

Whereas Mr Kirk would know of grievance as to why private prosecutions could occur to many. To date, may be for reason of logistics, those of us who try to Mr Kirk write with more exactness, only have clear enough evidence ‘to immediately proceed' with a prosecution of a criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams, in England, if necessary.

It occurs to those of us who try to help Mr Kirk write in ways more suitable to helping the working of the Courts, that it is within Mr Oliver's responsibilities to his client SW Police that he would be eager to bring a criminal prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams, so as to distance SW Police from being tarnished by Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct.

Given the basic evidence as below against Dr Tegwyn Williams is so very clear indeed, and obviously a very serious matter, if Police or their lawyers do not bring a prosecution against Dr Tegwyn Williams that leaves individuals in S.W. Police or individuals at their lawyers open to the charge of conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. It is a clear enough case to be easily merit and be investigated by an outside police force.

I am sure a man of standing such as Mr Oliver would not wish the good name of his client SW Police or their lawyers be drawn into allowing credible allegations of criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams. We therefore would like to hear from you as to how you propose to help facilitate a prosecution regards Dr Tegwyn Williams.

To clarify we remind that the clear criminal case against Dr Tegwyn Williams is that;-

Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to and attended the Cardiff Crown Court, including on 2 December 2009, with information to substantially affect the outcome of the Crown Court and ways that could be expected to significantly contribute to losing Mr Kirk his liberty for life, by the single assertion that there was irreparable brain damage and possible brain tumour that affects behaviour.

Dr Tegwyn Williams must have known that Mr Kirk did not have brain damage (to affect behaviour) to merit indefinite loss of liberty.

Mr Kirk does not have brain damage from assessment in Wales, England and France

Dr Tegwyn Williams did not use anyone who is medically qualified to determine scans to say that Mr Kirk has ‘brain damage' and was not entitled to progress the view he did.

We ask you to receive this information with care and to be very clear, precise what you do with it and exactly who you pass it to at South Wales Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales).

As stated, we feel that in such a clear case of wrongdoing by Dr Tegwyn Williams, anyone not acting to bring a prosecution when able to do so, may be obstructing justice or merit charges of being in a criminal conspiracy with Dr Tegwyn Williams.

The outcome will also be added to the twenty years of events that we consider should go before a jury trial.

We look forward to hearing from your kind self with news of how Dr Tegwyn Williams criminal conduct is to be addressed.

Please would his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn note that we feel the 'mindset' that may emerge from this letter can be so relevant to be ‘grounds to appeal' following the decision of HHJ Seys Llewellyn on 11 and 12 July 2011.

Because the ‘mindset' here can indicate whether there was substantial unfairness in previous cases, before His Honour Seys Llewellyn, to even justify changes to case law, we feel it should all be addressed.

We see grounds for using the EU Court of Human Rights limited on the kinds of such ‘very clear' issues as above.

Yours,

Mackenzie Friends from around the world

Another approach is this, below or anarchy, perhaps and we take to the streets not forgetting other methods, in reserve, to concentrate their evil little minds.

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 11^th July 11 Hearing for MAPPA Disclosure and application to put off Machine Gun Damages Claim for Five Years

Kirk v South Wales Police    6 Actions for Damages

Kirk v NHS, Dr Tegwyn Williams, Professor Wood, HMP Prison Cardiff

Applications

1. A can of worms or a can of worms?

2. Last two years ‘mindset' of South Wales Police calls for the trial judge to re consider his 2010 judgments, currently subject to appeal.

3. Transfer all litigation to England

4. Transfer to High Court outside Wales

5. Consolidation of cases due to extreme and unusual case of blatant police bullying making previous case law, relied upon by Defence, as totally irrelevant.

6. Machine Gun case, falsified psychiatric reports and other failed 2010 police prosecutions, all for the Defendant to delay ongoing civil actions, should be given to an outside police force for a thorough independent criminal investigation.

•A.     HM Court Service (Wales)

1. HMCS refuse Claimant access to public counter

2. Communicate by e-mails

3. Make telephone calls for clarification

4. Allowed pay court fees by credit card over phone

5. Allowed to have affidavits sworn at court before a Court Order dead line

6. Conspired to prosecute common assault conviction (2^nd Nov 2010), ignoring medical evidence, HMCS not placing evidence before the District Judge

7. Court manager & HM Treasury Solicitor's ‘internal memos', circa 2003, re ‘Vexatious Litigant' registration, revealing miserable but expensive attempts over five years + and losing vital court files to block Claimant's right to the rule of law.

8. HMCS refuses to disclose information to the Claimant in the trial and conviction, in Claimant's absence, now before Welsh Administrative Court. Immediate withdrawal of bail restrictions and arrest order when part release took place in May 2011.....utter abuse of process and criminal conduct.

9. Deliberate withholding of ex MP's obtained independent medical report for 2^nd Dec 2009 hearing, castigating Dr Williams on intrusive dangerous POW unnecessary brain scan and giving false evidence for 10 Cardiff Crown Court judges.

•B.      Criminal Conduct of SWP solicitors, Dolmans of Cardiff.

1. False Feb 09 Chief Superintendant sworn affidavit despite Dolmans having been supplied with 50 odd Claimant lever arch files identifying the court cases and police break-in to his veterinary surgery with Barbara Wilding denying knowledge thereof .

2. 22^nd July 2009 Dolmans had Claimant jailed and ignored trial judge 2010 Court Order to disclose details of complaint that had to his arrest and jail, designed to delay civil trials.

3. Dolmans fully aware Dr Tegwyn Williams' false psychiatric reports concocted by police for Claimant's incarceration in Broadmoor for life.

[‘Significant brain damage', brain tumour and evidence on 2^nd December 2009]

4. Claimant receives Estimated Defendant's £800,000 legal costs

5. Refuse mediation for the cash or from tax payer quoting trial judge's view!

•C.      Trial Judge

1. Claimant refused to prosecute several incidents because convicted despite being unrelated to his proposed prosecution or after specific bullying.

Eg.   a. Overhead video catching Claimant being beaten up by police

         b. Breach of the Peace allegation withdrawn due to forged police papers, countless court irregularities and CPS perjury before Recorder of Cardiff.

         c. Roundabout incident and motoring conviction irrelevant to "We will get the ***" said by police and overhead heard by veterinary nurse planted in back of court due to Claimant's absence. All refused incidents now subject to appeal, in Wales, having been refused an English court.

2. Refuses to consolidate.....4^th, 5^th damages cases and 'machine gun' case whilst defence application is to put off the latter, effectively, for 5 years.

3. MAPPA minutes disclosure so far refused identifying more in the conspiracy, sat around eight tables, to have Claimant either shot or jailed, IPP, for life.

ie 8^th June 09 Barry police station MAPPA meeting, no one ever told the Claimant and 1st June 09 IAG meeting at police HQ, 3 weeks before arrest registered in level 3 MAPPA, top 5% most dangerous , with the hpe of getting him shot (see leaked MAPPA memos). 17^th Dec 09 Claimant's name removed from MAPPA surveillance, again, without explanation or knowledge of Claimant until too late to inform judge for bail.

•D.     Machine Gun Trial

South Wales Police arranged with CAA for four other identical ‘guns', on replica WW1 aircraft or museums to be taken by owners to gunsmiths! In Claimant's case the Welsh police travelled with it, often alone, 2000 miles, contrary to HO gun Regulations, touring the UK desperate to frame the Claimant for mandatory ten year prison sentance.

English police washed their hands if it refusing to arrest either new owner or previous owner of Lewis machine gun so Welsh police called them as prosecution witnesses after attempting to modifying the ‘gun' more, for trial, police knowing the new owner had , himself, modified it, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

Machine gun trial heard no evidence of Claimant's ‘permanent brain damage/brain tumour' with the trial judge pretending he knew nothing of it.

Claimant refused repeated bent legal representation, sent into prison, gave no evidence, called no witnesses , refused judge's demand for defence statement, refused to sum up , jury making up its mind on the very first day of evidence stating, to the Claimant's friends and relations in a Cardiff restaurant immediately after the shambolic trial, "all the police were lying".

NHS, Williams, Prof Wood, HM prison (Nov 2010 £50,000 judgment awarded to Claimant, by trial judge against HM Prison Cardiff is still live. Retired HM Governor ignored thi judge's Order for ‘Governor at the time' statement for any disclosure of audit trail or did HMCS block serving of the summons for false imprisonment in the first place? It stinks, doesn't it?

•E.      Police/NHS/Dr Tegwyn Williams/ Professor Wood/ HM Prison Conduct

Claimant' forced prolonged illness was a deliberate tactic by most of above Defendants to prejudice his civil litigation.

After Claimant's release from prison, on 9^th Feb 2010, NHS refused to carry out a brain scan or operation, Welsh GP practices refused Claimant as a patient and only by going to France did he obtain a brain scan and urgently overdue hip replacement, in March 2011, to get him off powerful analgesics and other mind hallucinating drugs for acute pain.

Human Rights abuse was rife, but who, in Wales, is counting?

Summary

Another typical example of antiquated adversarial UK legal system, contrary to European methods of obtaining the truth, propagated in Cardiff, this time, for their HM Partnership ‘gravy train' to prolong proceedings for as long as possible using, yet again, the tried and tested method of ‘Treacle Treatment', to Delay.

7. By this court, not consolidating cases, not transferring to the High Court, out of Wales and for independent police force not examining Claimant's private prosecution evidence served, again, this week at Cardiff Central police station and currently before an English criminal court, this trial judge is at serious risk of abuse of process, blocking mediation and settlement out of court, many knowing a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice within the Welsh judiciary is proved.

8. The Defendants are relying on the usual ‘treacle treatment', for a Claimant against the State, to either ‘run out of money', ‘run out of steam' or, simply, ‘die'.

Voltaire wrote, something like, ‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right'.

The Claimant believes, there is only one truth, no matter which litigant has control of it.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

St Doha

Brittany.

.

Machine Gun Case and MAPPA Disclosure 11th July 2pm at Cardiff County Court

Maurice — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:18:00 GMT

Roll up, roll up, see corruption in the raw!

While I was outside the Cardiff court yesterday, demonstrating with megaphone and posters, a relation of one of the machine gun jury, in January 2009, came up and said she was appalled at Judge Paul Thomas QC's conduct, he stating she believed it had been, "chaotic and bloody shambolic". I told him, knowing the taffia's real reason behind the trial, I could have been a mass murderer and I would still have got off!

Yesterday's e-mails from both Adrian Oliver, for machine gun case damages and Morgan Cole , for Dr Tegwyn Wiliams and Professor Wood false medical reports damages, both indicated frantic activity within the South Wales Police, to put both cases into the 'long grass'.

One or two more Welsh judges will oblige them, no doubt, to keep the truth from the general public

WANTED

Judge Paul Thomas QC

As Cardiff trial judge he refused me - my medication, my documents in cell below, bail, relevant witnesses, the right to cross examine relevant issues, the right to interview my own witnesses, to stop a hopeless trial, disclosure of the police fabricated conspiracy with MAPPA/FTAC, seeking IPP, that I was dangerous and in ‘possession of a WW1 decommissioned Lewis machine gun with live ammunition.

Jury decided verdict after first day of evidence

He refused the huge costs incurred

Evilness Personified

Published by Maurice Kirk www.kirkflyingvet.com

(Content of many WANTED posters to be dropped over Cardiff from a great height)

It stinks, does'nt it?

Come Witness More Corruption on the 11th July 2pm at Cardiff County Court

The conspiracy to having me shot or locked away for life, IPP, by the Defendant in this Monday's case, all surfaces in their very own made cesspit of evilness, known as a Cardiff court, changed, at 2pm.

Maurice pays for lunch and and sticky buns, in the intervals when the fire curtain comes down. That's if you can bear the stench, in the auditorium, in this local theatre of entertainment known as the Cardiff Justice Centre. 2pm

See video (in blog post below) of UK Law Lords scurrying out of court, last week, knowing these issues, to be raised on Monday, were, at last, before them, the method, to get it out of Wales, having been somewhat un-orthodox.

A general statement on behalf of "We the people..." who believe our government and law courts have undermined basic human rights and pledge to fulfil the promise of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is here.

MONDAY AGENDA

On Monday at 2pm police apply to court to put off my current machine gun one million pound claim until outcome of my 19 year running damages claim of police bullying ie 2years.

Also, today, my seperate claim against NHS, Dr Williams and Prof Wood falsified medical reports to get me to Ashworth High Security Prison has recieved in court an application by Defendants to stay also!.

Bearing in mind my private prosecutions in Cardiff mag are now subject to 'state a case' back at DJ Martin Brown and Bristol magistrates advise are back before judge Nicholas Cooke QC ,who you may remember,on 1st Oct 2009 throuout norman and myself, refusing me bail lying to you that the psychiatric report was correct..

Also 6 hours with police this week, repeating all complaints I generated when that evil Caswell Clinic, in 2009, run by Williams to fill his private clinics.

On Monday the trial judge is forced to make decision on whether I get MAPPA minutes of June 09 to Dec 09, not subject to PII, which reveals more of the conspiracy to get me to prison for life,unconvicted.

You shoukd be able to precict his behavioour after his last one which included I could not sue police3 for beating me up caught on over head camera (see videos).

There is much more I am not prepared to reveal just now

Application to a magistrates' court to state a case 5th July 2011

64.1.-(1) An application under section 111(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980(a) shall be made in writing and signed by or on behalf of the applicant and shall identify the question or questions of law or jurisdiction on which the opinion of the High Court is sought.

(2) Where one of the questions on which the opinion of the High Court is sought is whether there was evidence on which the magistrates' court could come to its decision, the particular finding of fact made by the magistrates' court which it is claimed cannot be supported by the evidence before the magistrates' court shall be specified in such application.

(3) Any such application shall be sent to a court officer for the magistrates' court whose decision is questioned.

Cardiff Magistrates
Cardiff
South Wales

5^th July 2011

Laying of Information against Adrian Oliver, Barbara Wilding and Dr Tegwyn Williams

An application under section 111(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980(a) is made to state a case before the High Court on the premise that Adrian Oliver drafted an affidavit for the County Court, having stated to the Cardiff County Court had full disclosure knowing the affidavit to be false for Barbara Wilding to sign it.

Further, for Barbara Wilding to have ignored the November 2008 Court Order, immediately handing in her notice as Chief Constable and then signing the 25^th February 2009 affidavit, knowing it to be false, was also a criminal offence.

To then employ medical staff, on or before 8^th June 2009, from her South Wales Police forensic unit, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, informing them Maurice Kirk was likely to be shot but deliberately delaying his arrest was a criminal offence.

Once detained in custody, on the 22^nd July 2009 for police using Adrian Oliver to lay complaint, knowing it to be false, was a criminal offence.

The magistrate knew or should have known all three of the accused were all implicated if not fully aware, in over 130 criminal allegations brought by the South Wales Police of which as few as 12 had been found proven in local Welsh courts, was part of promised immunity to prosecution in the Principality, purely for profit.

The HM Court Service (Wales) and Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) were equally well informed, in that 29^th June 2011 magistrates court hearing with prima facie evidence of an apparent conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by all three accused and should or did inform the district judge accordingly.

Dr Tegwyn Williams was employed by police to falsify his first psychiatric report to MAPPA and IAG, on the 1^st June 2009, following Maurice Kirk's applications to the Royal Courts of Justice and elsewhere, in England, for an independent police investigation.

The magistrate had access to all this above information and documents already before him, with both the CPS, and HMCS in attendance together with Adrian Oliver, also an officer of the court, all bound, by oath, not to knowingly allow an ‘abuse of process' to be obtained in any England and Wales court of law.

For the magistrate to deliberately state the findings of Dr Tegwyn Williams, ‘significant brain damage', ‘paranoid delusional disorder' [belief Maurice Kirk believed police were bullying him] and ‘having a possible brain tumour' was, in itself, an abuse and a criminal offence.

Dr Tegwyn Williams neither had the qualifications nor the knowledge and when in possession of contrary evidence by experts, to have knowingly falsified numerous, some yet undisclosed, despite court order, psychiatric reports, to have Maurice Kirk sectioned to Ashworth high security prison for life, was a criminal offence.

Williams was aware such an attempt would prejudice Maurice Kirk's 19 year running civil damages claim against the police and nearly 8 months imprisonment, that Maurice Kirk was in possession of a machine gun, had been fabricated by Barbara Wilding for her own private purposes.

6 hours, today, with Cardiff police and visiting Cardiff Crown court, upon the advice of and English court, in Bristol, was a joke. HHJ Cooke QC repeating his arrogant deceit by refusing disclosure of my own medical records, he personally had ordered to get him sectioned, will again go before the Criminal Court of Appeal, London and will again be videoed for internet coverage to expose South Wales deceit riddled judiciary driven by avarice.

For police, today, to suggest Maurice Kirk report his complaint of ‘attempted murder' to IPCC is an insult to his intelligence, since they know he had already been there, countless times, bought the T-shirt and seen the movie.

Police, today, refused to investigate my complaints or refer them to the CPS but, instead, referred the documents to the South Wales Police HQ, Bridgend.

Gloucestershire police have already refused to investigate sending all the evidence to the villains.

Maurice Kirk makes application to pay £20,000 or whatever sum of money it takes, to a police officer, for the release of records relating only to him, created by IAG, MAPPA, Caswell Clinic, HM prison, Cardiff, Cardiff courts and Dr Tegwyn Williams thereby unable to be withheld, any longer, on the legal argument of Public Interest Immunity to be attempted in another thoroughly corrupt welsh environment, Cardiff County Court, on 11^th and 12^th July, before HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC.

All invited, lunch on Maurice Kirk, as usual.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Enclosed criminal charges before 28^th June 2011 Cardiff Magistrates Court

Criminal Charges

Barbara Wilding, ex-Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary

On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Adrian Oliver and other persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009, for His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, knowing it to be false, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On a day between 1^st June 2009 and 25^th June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown and by laying false information before Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) meetings, you attempted to murder Maurice John Kirk knowing it to be unlawful and contrary to Criminal Attempts Act 1981.1.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Chalice, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, one WWI Lewis machine gun, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On the 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, you did conspire to pervert the course of justice by having Maurice John Kirk arrested and gaoled for being in possession of ammunition, knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

On or about 22nd June 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, under Operation Orchid, you did harass Maurice John Kirk and/or Kirstie Louse Kirk and her daughter, indicating social services may remove Genevieve Kirk from the family unit when knowing the reasons to be false and contrary to section 2 of the Harassment Act 1997.

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors, Windsor Place, Cardiff

1. On a day between the 4th Day of October 2008 and 26^th Day of Feb 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with Barbara Wilding and other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of a sworn affidavit, dated 25^th Feb 2009,following the Order of His Honour Nicholas Chambers QC,knowing it to be false and contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

2. On a day between 19^th and 20^th June 2009 in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with other persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the laying of information, namely, threat to cause criminal damage,knowing it to be false and causing Maurice John Kirk to be arrested, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police Forensic Psychiatric Unit, Bridgend, South Wales

1. On a day between 8^th June and 17^th December 2009, in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, with persons unknown, did conspire to pervert the course of justice by the production of psychiatric reports of Maurice John Kirk knowing them to be false and written without the necessary qualifications, contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

2. On 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court in the Vale of Glamorgan South Wales, with Richard Thomlow, Crown Prosecution barrister, did conspireto pervert the course of justice by the laying of information before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, knowing it to be false, namely, that Maurice John Kirk had significant brain damage and a possible brain tumour and recommending he be sentto ahigh security psychiatric hospital for an indeterminate period.

Lord Justice Moses caught on VIDEO Refusing re Dr Tegwyn Williams' Falsifed Medical Records Conspiracy to obtain My IPP Imprisonment

Maurice — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:07:00 GMT

Royal Courts of Justice, today...What a load of nonsense. The Appeal before Lord Justice Moses et al, was today!

"No, Mr Kirk, you cannot have an oral hearing ....we have already decided to dismiss your Appeal" (arguing with Cardiff judge, Nicholas Cooke QC, who damned well knew Williams was lying nor had the qualifications to try and section me to Broadmoor, on his interpretation of an NHS brain scan!

Now RCJ judges are in on the act.

Imagine that approximate account of what was said in front of Rear Admiral rtd. Norman Scarth Esq. provoked?!

The pandemonium in number 9 court, with utterances of truth only from the well of the court, leading to eight security guards, ready to drag out two old men must be published see video here:

A Den of Evil - Maurice Kirk & Norman Scarth in court 28/6/2011

Anarchy is just around the corner and it starts at Cardiff Magistrates tomorrow at 10 am. and then across the country

See new photos on Gallery.

A Bradford judge sent Patrick Cullinane to prison for four months simply for using an audio recorder in court.
If Lord 'Justice'(??) Moses had any guts he would have stayed in court, called security to take us down to the cells & then sent us to prison, as Patrick was. Instead, while the next case was supposed to be proceeding, he, Mr Justice Maddison and Leeds Recorder all scuttled out like frightened rabbits, leaving the pathetic female usher to act as though she were God Almighty!
Norman Scarth

Magna Carta Day,15th June, Public Demonstation, Leeds County Court -- 'Right to Private Prosecutions' Meeting 12 Noon

Maurice — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:08:00 GMT

Adrian Oliver of Dolmans Solicitors has been the Solicitor of South Wales Police and is the MasterMind behind "defending" all bullying incidents, the cumulative harassment and the multi-organisational collusion under the label MAPPA.

See 'HM Conspiratorial Partnership' in Cardiff magistes courts as an example of blocking Private Prosecutions here:this document.

"Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy. There will be anarchy."

Lord Denning: 1982

WANTED

(Picture on gallery or Downloads)

Following posters, shortly,on gallery

Judge T M Hughes QC

Judge Morris

Judge Vosper

Judge Llewellyn Jones

Judge Elleri Rees

Judge Gareth Jones

Judge Neil Bidder QC

More Cardiff Judges to come

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Appellant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Respondent

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant is and was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functions. 2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft.

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 aeroplane and ‘gun' from a private collection with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' as an integral part of the fuselage.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' dismounted.

7. 2007: The DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the RAF, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and gun to another display pilot who modified the gun for his own purposes.

9. On 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant, had occurred

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under her control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitors offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the court order had not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant’s affidavit entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running civil action for damages, CF101741 + three others..

12. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group.

13. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies that the Claimant was to be arrested and taken into custody for being in possession of a prohibited weapon.

14. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot.

15. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant when police were called to be in attendance.

16. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time at the offices of the Defendant in her Bridgend head quarters .and again, refused mutual exchange of witness statements.

17. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when her solicitors were contacted by the Claimant despite the court order having given until 4pm.

18. On 20^th June 2009 the Defendant’s solicitors laid complaint against the Claimant to be arrested for threat of criminal damage.

19. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid’ and ‘Chalice, caused’ a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant’s home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

20. The English police refused to ‘touch it with a barge pole, once they became aware that the Welsh police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find a licenced arms dealer where it would be collected by the Defendant.

21. The Welsh police then hawked the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to Home Office Regulations during which time had it modified, to be illegal, contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act at their special laboratory in South Wales.

22. On 22^nd June 2009 police returned to the Claimant’s home and arrested him in the road outside his property, cautioning him that he had been arrested for: a. Threat of committing criminal damageb. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation and despite court orders from His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, falsified to assist their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding.

24. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police removed the Claimant’s lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files relating to the Claimant’s ongoing Claims of bullying, harassment and false imprisonment none of which have been returned to the Claimant.

25. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid an information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been in possession of a prohibited weapon, one 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the gun, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act.

26. Upon reading the Claimant’s June 2009 64 page Defense statement the Barry Magistrates court, following legal advice, allowed the Claimant unconditional bail.

27. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the court order lying to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

28. Lies by the Defendant were used, eventually, before ten Cardiff Crown Court judges, no less, refusing the Claimant disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant’s name.

29. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, ‘income from crime’.

30. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act.

31. In September 2009 when it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer sworn to the Welsh courts Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, IPP, imprisonment for Public Protection.

32. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false.

33. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Defendant having earlier withdrawn the third indictment, was found not guilty on all remaining indictments and was released from custody.

34. No defence evidence or summing up was needed from the Claimant with further confirmation by nine members of the jury confirming to him that their decision of ‘Not Guilty’ was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence was given and cross examined.

35. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner were not both also in the dock as defendants.

36. The Claimant’s complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept aside in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in south Wales in 1992.

37. The arrest and detention of the Claimant were unlawful.

38. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guiltv of the offence for which he was arrested. 39. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

40. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

41. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

42. Unless restrained by the Court police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.
43. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

44. The Plaintiff therefore claims of the Defendant:- Damages Exemplary damages Special Damages. Costs. In pursuant of Sections of the County Court Act 1984.

45. The Claimant retains his right for a lawyer to amend this Claim.

South Wales Police sued for One Million Euros for Falsifying Machine Gun and Medical Evidence

Maurice — Thu, 26 May 2011 17:14:00 GMT

STOP PRESS

Welsh Court of Appeal Lost!

25% of original Damages Claim Struck Out....the highly sensitve political ones (see December 2010 site video)

'C'est un judgment bizarre', a Breton would say!

Immediate Thoughts on Receipt of 17^th May 2011 Court of Appeal Judgment, BELOW, Refusing Application to Appeal

A. Upon reading the judgment, who wrote it? Defendant's solictors?

B. Someone was back in London by the time the trial judge, HHJSeys LLewelyn QC, read the 'first' reasons realising the visiting judge had not addressed the main issues in dispute, namely, an exeptional case of bullying needing to be consolidated with stayed 4th ,5th , 6th Actions, including the new machine gun case, BELOW, referred to, extensively, in the Claimant's pleadings here LINK SKM

C. Who, then, wrote the 'second' reasons, as if an after thought explaining, maybe, why Cardiff court held back the decision, from the Claimant, for nine days?

D. Clearly, just using the 'struck out' list, below, as examples for the oral appeal shortly (London ), [ALL INVITED, DINNER, as usual, ON ME], is it blatently obvious either MR JUSTICE KITCHIN is also being bullied by 'HM Partnership' or was he never given the facts, on appeal, of the forty odd incidents listed in the first three Actions? With Cardiff manager's track record nothing would surprise me.
There can only be one truth - no matter whose hands it's in...
Maurice J Kirk

1. Stolen Cheques

The thief was identified by the Claimant in Barry Post Office during 2010 Claimant's Application to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC, in the Lower court, for Permission to Appeal. Both the court and police were informed of his whereabouts, by the Claimant but the Defendant again refused to investigate when his address was traceable from the post office. And a High Court judge now says the South Wales Police have no 'duty'!......With over a hundred incidents of this type of wicked conduct, within the seven or so Actions! Just how many does it take for a policeman to be culpable?

Mr Kitchin knows, to amalgamate cases further risks prison for high ranking South Wales Police.

That's HM Partnership's real 'Reasons' for yet another typical example in our British courts in 'meltdown', not to be published in newspapers.

'Struck Out' due to 'Collateral Attack' on a conviction obtained during an incident

2. Police Caught on Overhead Roadside Video [See it on video Gallery, 5th one back]

Despite police refusing to disclose videos of Claimant being 'beaten up' in Cardiff police cells, the original magistrates and Cardiff Crown Court were not even being allowed to see the overhead road side video because police withheld its disclosure until a year too late.

[The police cell videos were doctored, blanking out the top half of film to hide police identity]

Now the Appeal Court judge did not view the video either! Mr Kitchin undoubtedly argues 'police beating up their prisoners' is 'not relevant' because the terrified Claimant stupidly should not have pleaded guilty to trivial motoring offence thereby giving the bullying police immunity Immunity against any of their conduct throuout the incident...scarry or not scarry??

Roadside Video [5th back on this website video gallery] catches Cardiff police 'beating up' the Claimant after being dragged out of his car. This was before he was even arrested for ‘failure to give road side breath test' having just been followed directly from the Cardiff Crown Court where he and his secretary had been all morning complaining to the then, Recorder of Cardiff, Mr Justice Roderick Evans, about nine years of excessive South Wales Police bullying and proving police documents had been forged (see next incident).

3. Alleged Breach of the Peace at Vale Glamorgan Show

Another, 'Struck out' due to collateral attack on a conviction that, this time, never happened !!! The Claimant was never even charged (four versions of withheld BOP as Cla imant'sexhibits), jailed but never convicted. Bridgend Clerk of the Court, many months later, persuaded police, over lunch, to withdraw the alleged BOP offence, part way through a trial of other charges, quite unrelated, another time, another place, because the Claimant would obviously plead 'not guilty' and would have to go to prison due to common law!

Liar. Just as at the first hearing, in Barry, the Claimant was not told of what the female prosecutor or clerk had before them, witnessed by Claimant's secretary. It was BOP in three different forms!!!!!

The Claimant 'made it worth someone's while' to extract from Bridgend Magistrates records the original clerk's notes (exhibit) confirming scandalous conduct

4. 'Struck Out' due to 'collateral attack' in Claimant's absence from court due to in hospital after motor bike accident!

Veterinary nurse, planted in back of court, signed a sworn affidavit after hearing police stating:

"He drives around in his little white sports car quoting human rights...we are going to get the b'stard".

A trivial motoring conviction should not be the excuse for a High Court judge to protect the bullies breaking UK law.

5 The Defence's Hunter Case Law argument was quite inappropriate for such an unusual, extreme and excessive bullying case with more than one hundred incidents in the six or seven Particulars of Claim. Just how many incidents of police bullying does it take to remove their devine right not to investigate but allowed to cause physical injury, time and time again?

6. Defendant's ‘Mindset' not relevant?!!!!!! Has this High Court judge ever been confronted with such extreme acts of criminal conduct by police?. Of course not but the 'Maurices' of this world who dare question 'authority' are expendable SEE the injury list IN 'VICTIMS UNITE' blogs..

See 26^th May 2011 Machine Gun Particulars of Claim [ below] including False Psychiatric records all fabricated to obtain a false imprisonment designed to interfere with these very civil proceedings. Of course Mr Kitchin avoided the issue, that was his brief.

7. South Wales Police's, ‘Operation Orchid', at the same time, putting the fear of God into my wife when they threatened to have Social Services snatch our 10 year old daughter away has caused quite unforseen repercussions.

Etc, etc.

Mr Kitchin clearly does not realise anarchy is only just around the corner, in Wales and possibly, elsewhere, headed by those who know just where and when to strike, if the break down of law and order in our appalling law courts, driven by avarice, is not sorted out RIGHT NOW.

MACHINE GUN CASE

Once again it is the K Team that has to draft the court papers as no lawyer has been found after a 15 months trawl through solicitors's offices. It is of no surprise to me when you consider Dr Tegwyn Williams was given 'carte blanche' to falsify medical reports for 10, no less, Cardiff judges all knowing, full well, they were untrue but refusing bail due some higher sinister authority. Only one Welsh newspaper, The Glamorgan Gem, published a few of the appalling facts of dishonesty thoughout the Welsh judiciary in this case. If had not been for this web site, publishing day by day accounts of the trial, I would still be in jail due to that HM Partnership lot headed by Nicholarse Cooke QC, The Recorder of Cardiff.

There only remains outstanding which quick act of retribution is appropriate for the likes of Dr Tegwyn Williams as he, unlike Barbara Wilding, is not afforded the luxury of an armed guard. A Welsh court process? What a joke! That is pretty pointless considering our watching the Welsh NHS leave him loose to do it all over again on some unsuspecting individual with less luck.

Common Purpose and Law Society intend to wipe out jury trails and lay magistrates the very two facets of my machine gun case that shone through as the back bone of what we should be proud of. When the two systems are finally snuffed out by HMCS last one switch off the lights, please.

Court of Appeal Judgment by the Honourable Mr Justice Kitchin

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

Reasons:

An appeal has no real prospect of
success.

ln a long and careful judgment of 30
November 2010 the judge addressed the application by the defendant to strike
out the claimant's claims in respect of a number of incidents

ln particular

ln action CF04141, the judge struck
out an allegation in respect of the theft of cheques in that, as a matter of
law, the defendant did not owe the claimant a privately actionable duty of
care.

In actions BS614159-MC65, CF101741 and
CF204141, the judge struck out a series of allegations as being an abuse of
process in that they amounted to collateral attacks on criminal convictions of
the defendant or on conclusive findings which have been made against him in
other proceedings.

The claimant now seeks permission to
appeal on a number of grounds. There is nothing in any of them.

First the claimant contends that
the proceedings took place without him being able to take part. This was
plainly not the case. The judge explained in detail in paragraphs 3 and 4 of
his judgment the careful steps he took to ensure that the claimant was not in
any way disadvantaged and referred in paragraphs 3 to 6 to the extensive
submissions from the claimant which he considered.

Second, the claimant says he was
subjected to unfair pressure from the court and was unfairly disadvantaged. To
the contrary, it is apparent from the paragraphs of the judgment to which I
have referred that the judge took all reasonable steps to ensure the claimant
was not subjected to unfair pressure, nor disadvantaged.

Third, the claimant submits the
court wrongly excluded evidence. I reject this contention. There was no
material dispute of fact in relation to any of the allegations the judge struck
out.

Fourth, it is said the judge
failed to address key submissions. I do not accept this is so. The judge set
out the claimant's case on each issue very clearly. Indeed the judge accepted a
number of the claimant's submissions in refusing to strike out aspects of his
case.

Fifth, the claimant contends the
judge erred in law. In my judgment the defendant has not identified any proper
ground in support of this allegation. The judge correctly identified the
principle established in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and
his application of that principle to the facts alleged by the claimant cannot
be faulted. The other claims were struck out upon the application of the well
established principle that it is not permissible for a claimant to bring a
claim which amounts to collateral attack on an earlier criminal conviction or a
conclusive finding made against him in earlier proceedings.

Finally, the claimant asserts that
the judge failed to protect the claimant against the defendant's mindset. This
provides no basis for an appeal against the specific findings of the judge.

For all these reasons the judge was
also right to refuse permission to appeal.

Reasons

This is a case management order. The
judge declined to order all the cases to be consolidated. This was a perfectly
reasonable decision, particularly since the cases are already being heard
together.

There is no need for the cases to be
transferred to the High Court. Nor has any justification been shown for having
them transferred out of Wa1es.

An appeal has no real prospect of success.

17^th May 2011

Reply to Refusal

Dear Ms Pahl,

Please Forward, in your usual reliable way

31st May 2011

Kirk v South Wales Police

Appeal at Court of Appeal No.s CF029/2011a & CF030/2011a
( May 2011 court letter contains variations in case numbers)

FAO Clerk of the Court,

Further to the predicted refusal notice, based on politics and not facts, received on Saturday, 28th May, I apply for an oral hearing and be permitted witnesses to the facts, before the court, to attend without fear of intimidation.

I also apply that it take place not before but on the 15th June or onwards, in London, but not 28th June as it clashes with another court and an equally scandalous bit of Welsh bloody nonsense.

I also have medical appointments in both France and Londoin to entwine with dates already fixed.

If the hearing is in South Wales I run a very real risk of being falsly arrested again and finish up in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, as was attempted last time, following deliberate falsification of both Welsh HM CPS information and Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric reports.

Last time, following the Welsh filth and their usual tactics, being completely ignored or actively supported by 10 Welsh judges, Welsh HM Court Service and Welsh National Health Service, my liberty, without an appeal, now comes secondary in priority, following revenge, the latter, set for the rest of my short life, to be sufficient to educate the whole world, by exposing your evil Welsh judiciary, driven by greed.

Oh, if only I had listend to both my mother and father about the truth of South Wales, following their shock, in 1992, that I had bought a veterinary practice near Cardiff.

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Puits aux Papillons

St Doha

22230 Merdrignac

France

0033624571548

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

IN THE CARDIFF COURT

Maurice Kirk Claimant

Chief Constable of South Wales Police Defendant

Particulars of Claim

1. The Defendant was at all material times the chief officer of the South Wales Constabulary and the police officers hereinafter referred to were at all material times acting under the direction and control of the Defendant in the performance or purported performance of their functiion

2. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft by the Claimant's old friend, Mr Viv Bellamy

3. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 replica aeroplane and ‘gun' from a prosecution witness with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' s an integral part of the fuselage and therefore exempt under the 1968 Fire rms Act.

4. 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This became the critical argument in the trial but blocked throughout the twelve days of roceedings of utter nonsense.

5. 2000: The DH2 with the same Lewis antique was flown by the Claimant at the Farnborough Air Show by invitation of another old friend of the Claimant, Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame.

6. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' mounted.

7. 2007: he DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out, by the Royal Air Force, to a civilian for further repair in Hampshire also aware it was decommissioned.

8. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and ‘gun' to another display pilot, a prosecution witness, who ‘modified' the gun for his own purposes.

9. On or about 25^th February 2009 the Defendant signed a sworn affidavit knowing it to be or ought to have known it to be, false, in that paragraphs, between14 to 21, contained erroneous information, namely, incidents, involving both the Defendant and Claimant had ppeared to never have occurred. Police court cases had occurred and the Defendant's attendance, in force, with the use of a crow bar and sledge hammer, to enter the Claimant's Cardiff veterinary surgery, had also occurred. This amounts at least to misfeasance in public office.

10. Following the 2008 Court Order by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, for the Defendant to sign an affidavit that full disclosure of evidence, under the Defendant's control, had been disclosed to the Claimant, the latter entered the Defendants solicitor's' offices, on or about the 25^th February 2009 complaining the Court Order had still not been carried out.

11. The Claimant, upon receipt of a copy of the Defendant's affidavit then entered Barry Police Station and was both videoed and interviewed at length following his complaint that the Chief Constable had knowingly signed a false affidavit to avoid disclosure of evidence relevant to the nineteen year running covert police surveillance and civil actions for damages, referred to in CF101741 + four others.

12. The sale and subsequent management change of the Claimant's South Wales veterinary practice, in May 2009, allowed the Claimant to reveal, at last, on U Tube and websites worldwide the conduct of the South Wales Police with their covert surveillance team that had operated for well over ten years. The Claimant's 64 page June 09 witness statement, summarising their unusual and extreme behavior, was now being prepared for court.

13. On 1^st June 2009 the Defendant caused the Claimant to be subjected to a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) enquiry following a meeting, at the South Wales Police Head Quarters, Bridgend, by the Independent Advisory Group (IAG).

14. On 8^th June 2009, at Barry police station MAPPA meeting, police informed the agencies, present, including staff from Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison, that the Claimant was a category level 3, very dangerous and was to be arrested and ‘taken into custody' for being in possession of a prohibited weapon, a machine gun.

15. The police also informed the agencies that should the Claimant approach the Chief Constable then he was likely to be shot which has caused the Claimant to seek asylum in France for fear of his life

16. On 15^th June 2009 the Claimant brought further civil proceedings, in the Administrative Court, London, against the Defendant and Co-Defendant, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons relating to covert police surveillance. Covert plain clothed police officers were already in attendance.

17. On 18^th June 2009 the Claimant again laid the complaint, this time inside the offices of the Defendant's Bridgend South Wales Police head quarters where again there was refusal, by the Defendant, to ‘mutually exchange
witness statements' ordered by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC

18. On 19^th June 2009 the Defendant again refused to exchange witness statements when the Defendant's solicitors, Dolmans, were contacted by the Claimant despite the Court Order having given the Defendant until 4pm.that day

19. On 20^thJune 2009 the Defendant's solicitors laid complaint with their client, against the Claimant, to be arrested for a ‘threat of criminal damage' which amounts to more bullying and harassment.

20. On 21^st June 2009 police Operations, ‘Orchid' and ‘Chalice, caused' a sizeable force of police officers to surround the Claimant's home, in St Donats, Vale of Glamorgan, requiring an armed response unit, a police helicopter and both forensic psychiatrists and a lay advisor for the Claimant to be in attendance. The operation was aborted once the Claimant was seen drinking tea with his family in their front garden.

21. On 22^nd June 2009 24/7 police surveillance caused the Claimant to be arrested in the road outside his property and cautioning him from a written script, following legal advise, that he had been arrested for:

a. Threat of committing criminal damage

b. Being in possession of a prohibited weapon

c. Being in possession of prohibited ammunition

22. ‘Operation Orchid' caused a second team of South Wales Police to interview the Claimant's wife at the family home, with the hope they could obtain a statement from her that the Claimant had a history of mental illness. This was in the hope of avoiding the criminal proceedings being put to strict proof. The Claimant's wife was threatened that her and Claimant's ten years old daughter was at serious risk of being taken into care, by the South Wales social services, if she did not cooperate. Blatant intimidation and harassment of the Claimant and his family.

23. The Claimant was never charged with the first arrest allegation, (a), and despite repeated court orders to reveal the evidence and statements by Dolmans, solicitors, they assisted their client by being a party to the February 2009 Chief Constable's sworn affidavit.

24. Despite repeated applications in Cardiff Crown Court, by the Claimant, for specific disclosure relating to the alleged ‘threat of criminal damage' to countless judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service, South Wales Police and Dolmans, the Defendant's solicitors, being the complainant, all refused.

25. Final proof of conspiracy needed just one last refused application, this time before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, the management judge in the ongoing civil proceedings between the Claimant and Defendant.

26. Dolmans had little choice but to again refuse to disclose the evidence of their client's criminal conduct and/or gross mismanagement during the days leading up to the Claimant's 22^nd June 2009 ridiculous arrest

27. Dolmans falsified evidence assisting in the arrest of the Claimant, their client, the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Ms Barbara Wilding, the latter assuring them, no doubt, of their immunity to prosecution. The overall plan was to prejudice the Claimant's position in the ongoing civil proceedings now that the ‘cover up' of an expensive ten year police covert surveillance team, on the Claimant, was starting to fall apart.

28. There was no intention of arresting the Claimant on fire arms charges. The Claimant, without full MAPPA approval or understanding, had been set up to be ‘lawfully killed' by an armed South Wales Police unit under direct orders from senior police officers.

29. Events following the early 2009 decision by these high ranking police officers, to have the Claimant eliminated, eventually became unmanageable due to the unpredictable conduct of their moving target and the effect of his postings on his website.

30. Between 22^nd and 23^rd June 2009 the police filmed and removed, from his home, the Claimant's lawfully held shot guns, ammunition and court files, the latter relating to the Claimant's ongoing complaint of police bullying, harassment, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments conducted in most un usual and extreme
manner suggesting vengeance at the tax payer's expense

31. None of the above items, guns, ammunition or court files have ever been returned to the Claimant with the police continuing to block the Claimant's right to re new his gun licences.

32. On 24^th June 2009 a police officer or officers laid information against the Claimant at Barry Magistrates court alleging that that the Claimant had been ‘in possession of a prohibited weapon', one antique 1916 Lewis machine gun and had sold the ‘gun', a year earlier, both contrary to the 1968 Fire Arms Act

33. The English police refused to ‘touch the subject with a barge pole' once they became aware that the South Wales Police had persuaded the Civil Aviation Authority to telephone ahead to the new owner, in England, to dismount the Lewis antique and alone drive it across Lincolnshire and beyond to find any licenced arms dealer where it could be, later, collected by the Defendant.

34. The Welsh police then ‘hawked' the Lewis antique nearly two thousand miles around the UK, contrary to strict Home Office Regulations, during which time the Defendant had it ‘modified' at their special police laboratory in South Wales. This Claim is yet another one of misfeasance in public office.

35. Upon reading the Claimant's June 2009 64 page Defence statement, on the Defendant's real motives behind his arrest, the Barry Magistrates court, together with legal advice, allowed the Claimant immediate and unconditional bail.

36. On 25^th June 2009 the police appealed the Court Order deliberately lying on the relevant facts, under consideration, to HHJ Hughes causing the Claimant to be further detained in custody in Cardiff prison.

37. Repeat of these lies by the Defendant occurred before a further nine more Cardiff Crown Court judges when opposing bail. False antecedent history together with this malicious false imprisonment is one of the major Claims of the Claimant.

38. The Defendant, over nearly eight months, deliberately refused the Claimant standard or specific disclosure of evidence, under their control, that would have cleared the Claimant's name before the need of a trial. Defamation is another serious Claim by the Claimant.

39. In July 2009 the Defendant brought a third indictment namely, obtaining income from the ‘proceeds of crime'. A judge, much later, caused this third indictment to be withdrawn. This event contributes to the large number of proceedings that the Claimant has won against the Defendant.

40. On 3^rd August 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams, forensic psychiatrist and Director of Caswell Clinic, South Wales Police forensic Unit, at Bridgend, signed a psychiatric report recommending the Claimant be sectioned and further remanded in custody to his medium secure psychiatric unit, Caswell Clinic, under Section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act having not even examined his patient

41. Dr Teqwyn Williams had in his possession, before 3^rd August 2009, psychiatric reports from both HM Prison Cardiff and his own Caswell Clinic doctors, that the Claimant did not need any medication or treatment relevant to the 1983 Mental Health Act.

42. On 28^thAugust 2009 a series of brain scans, arranged by Dr Tegwyn Williams, indicated no relevant abnormalities in the Claimant, confirmed at the time, in writing, by at least one expert at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgend.

43. In September 2009, after it was clear the Claimant was not going to employ a lawyer, with sworn allegiance to the South Wales courts, Dr Tegwyn Williams recommended that the Claimant be now transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison (IPP), Imprisonment for Public Protection with a term of imprisonment, without trail, of an inordinate length stating, without appropriate qualifications, the Claimant had ‘significant brain damage' and ‘possible cancer', neither of which had much chance of recovery.

44. Whilst this Claim could be conceived against Dr Tegwyn Williams alone, it is concluded here as a major act of harassment by the Defendant who had commissioned Dr Williams via FTAC and MAPPA.

45. The Claimant, following much needed legal advice retains the right of including Dr Tegwyn Williams as a Co-Defendant in these civil proceedings for damages.

46. On or about the 24^th October 2009 the Claimant was further remanded in custody in Cardiff Prison reliant on a further Dr Tegwyn Williams psychiatric report the Defendant knew or ought to have known was false as the National Health Service doctor was not even qualified to sign such a court document as true, to the best of his belief.

47. On the 2nd December 2009 the prosecution had convened a hearing, not tape recorded and in the absence of the Claimant, left locked up under the court, to discuss, at length, with the proposed trial judge and Dr Tegwyn Williams, the possibilities of avoiding the trial by way of a Section 41 or similar, of the 1983 Mental Health Act, that could have the Claimant locked away, without trial, for life.

48. But the Defendant had failed to obtain the second signatory from any appropriately qualified forensic psychiatrist, required by law, in either England or Wales, but not for the want of trying.

49. On the 2^nd December 2009 The Defendant failed to inform the proposed trial judge, HHJ Bidder QC, that the Claimant had caused not less than twelve psychiatric reports from a same number of psychiatrists that the Claimant was not requiring the need for either psychiatric assessment or treatment.

50. HM Court Service (Wales), as is their habit, failed to disclose to HHJ Bidder QC or the Claimant of the Claimant's privately obtained expert medical report, from outside Wales, having been served on Cardiff Crown Court the day before by an English solicitor and past MP for the Vale of Glamorgan.

51. The report seriously contradicted both those of Dr Tegwyn Williams' and the findings of Professor Roger Wood, the latter also unqualified to state an opinion that might affect permanent custody of the Claimant

52. On 7^tt December 2009 the Claimant, using other lawyers, again from well outside South Wales, caused the MAPPA coordinator, based at the Defendant's HQ, to indicate, in writing, ‘ The right arm did not know what the left arm of the law was doing'

53. On 17^th December 2009 the Defendant headed a hurriedly convened MAPPA meeting in the Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, due to yet another Claimant bail Application before HHJ Bidder QC scheduled that day in Newport Crown Court.

54. The Claimant's name for some reason, currently subject to HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC's outstanding Order for disclosure, was removed from the MAPPA register without any explanation to the Claimant causing further hardship and distress to the Claimant, in prison, still trying to establish his exact MAPPA status and why, just a before trial carrying a possible mandatory ten year prison sentence.

55. The Claimant has to this day never established why and later, why not, he was on the MAPPA register with the Defendant repeatedly refusing to disclose, contrary to law.

56. Defense evidence or ‘summing up' was never needed due the prosecution's fairy tale, a view held by at least nine members of the jury, stating to the Claimant, immediately after the trial, that their decision was already concluded by eleven of the jury after the first day of evidence and cross examination

57. On 9^th February 2010, at Cardiff Crown Court, the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' on the two remaining indictments and was released from custody with no conditions.

58. The jury also made the Claimant aware, immediately after the hearing, that they questioned why both the original seller to the Claimant, of the Lewis antique and the current owner, buying from the Claimant, were not also in the dock or behind bars.

59. The Claimant's complaints to the relevant police authorities, to investigate the conduct within South Wales Police, before and after his arrest and nearly eight months in custody, have been swept under the proverbial carpet in a perfunctory manner to which the Claimant is accustomed since first settling in South Wales.

60. The arrest and detention and prosecution of the Claimant were unlawful as the most appalling act of malice.

61. There were no reasonable grounds to believe that the Claimant was probably guilty of the offence for which he was arrested.

62. The decisions to arrest and detain the Claimant were such as no reasonable police officer would have reached.

63. The Claimant was detained for longer than was reasonably necessary and in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

64. Further, the actions of police officers set out above constitute harassment within meaning of section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and misfeasance in public office.

65. By reason of the matters aforesaid, the Claimant has suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety, damage to his reputation and was deprived of his liberty. He has been subjected to bullying, malicious prosecution and harassment, false imprisonment and contrary to the 1998 Human Rights Act.

Withheld NHS Medical Records

66. On or about 10^th February 2010 the Defendant arrested and detained in custody the Claimant for entering Caswell Clinic, when invited by the staff to collect his full medical records, promised by Dr Tegwyn Williams following the Claimant's applications under the Freedom of Information and Data Protection Acts. Also promises to his GP's secretary, in the presence of the Claimant, by the manager, stated they could be collected from the Caswell Clinic porter's lodge. His multi agency collusion has caused serious aggravation to the Claimant's health

67. The full medical records were not disclosed and currently remain with the South Wales National Health Service, also now refusing to hand them over.

68. The Claimant was charged with numerous allegations and jailed. Severe bail conditions were set before all charges were later dropped with the Defendant refusing to properly investigate the Claimant's complaint into the apparent falsified medical records written by both Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic and Professor Roger Wood of Swansea University

69. The Defendant's actions were both malicious and bullying and/or yet a further example of misfeasance in public office the Claimant has suffered under, by the Defendant, since 1992

HM Court Service (Wales).

70. In July 2010 ex South Wales Police officer, a Derrick Hassan, violently assaulted the Claimant, dependant at the time on a pair of crutches and on daily morphine sulphate and other analgesic medication. Hassan pushed the Claimant part way down a flight of stairs in Cardiff Crown Court causing the Claimant to attend casualty and treatment for a damaged ankle and increased his hip pain in a much overdue total hip replacement required, caused by the failure ofthe Defendant to investigate the Claimant's complaint, relating to falsified medical evidence. The Vale Hospital, Vale of Glamorgan, had to take this into consideration, without clarification being available, to cancel elected surgery.

71. Despite being given the name and address of an independent witness, not part of HM Court Service (Wales), the Defendant refused to have him interviewed thereby acting irresponsibly and with without due care. The conduct was malicious.

Racially Aggravated Public Order allegations

72. 69 On or about the 2^nd August 2010 the Claimant was arrested and jailed by the Defendant purely for monetary gain by a third party. The Crown Prosecution Service offered ‘no evidence' and the Claimant was found ‘not guilty' in his absence of all parties

73. Again, the Defendant refused to investigate thousands of pounds of damage caused, caught in the act by the Claimant, by these same complainants of the dismissed Public Order offences.

74. This malicious prosecution is a further act of both misfeasance in public office and harassment

Stolen Cheques incident currently under appeal at The Court of Appeal

75. On or around November 2010 the Claimant identified the thief of his stolen surgery cheques, some nine years earlier, the subject currently on appeal from Action CF101+ three others, before the Court of Appeal (Wales). The thief was giving his identity details to a named clerk in Barry Post Office. The Defendant, due to ill health and on crutches was unable to apprehend the thief.

76. Previously, the Defendant in the defenses of the earlier Action admitted to the Claimant that the Defendant had not been able to trace the thief despite being, known to the Defendant, given film footage of his cashing falsified Claimant's cheques and given his home address in Barry.

77. The Claimant informed the Defendant of the above new information but the Defendant refused to properly investigate or even speak to the clerk at the Barry Post Office or the Claimant on the new evidence.

78. In summary, the Claimant has suffered from the malicious intent of the Defendant's misfeasance in public office as well as the unprofessional behaviour of the Defendant's solicitors and of the Defendant's forensic psychiatrist. The Defendant's bullying and harassment resulted in false imprisonment, severe damage to reputation, completely unnecessary legal proceedings and thus a claim to damages, exemplary damages, special a criminal investigation and costs.

79. Unless restrained by the Court, police officers will continue to harass the Claimant.

80. The Claimant retains his right for trial by jury and for a lawyer to read and amend this Claim

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Puits aux Papillons
St Doha
22 230 Merdrignac
Bretagne
France

26^th May 2011

Copy to Cardiff Court of Appeal
             Cardiff County Court
             His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC
             The French Immigration Authorities

Welsh Only Arrest Warrant

Maurice — Tue, 10 May 2011 06:59:00 GMT

Interesting, isn't it: that as long as I do not cross the Severn Bridge into Wales, I will not be arrested? I have confronted the English police again today. Maybe the content of this Judicial Review explains?

Just like the Welsh police having me jailed for nearly 8 months on a trumped up charge of 'trading in machine guns'. There the English police also washed their hands of the nonsence refusing even to arrest the new machine gun owner. So the Welsh used him as a prosecution witness instead.as I faced a mandatory 5 year prison term for each charge before my Cardiff jury..

Not everybody knew but the gun, an antique Lewis, had been changed from decomissioned, as I sold her, attached to a replica WW1 DH2 fighter biplane flown at Farnborough, to a working prohibited weapon, contrary to the 1968 fire Arms Act.

The Welsh police therefore telephoned the Civil Aviation Authority, who in turn asked the display pilot and four others with old aircraft, to 'unbolt their guns' and drive through the country, alone to deposit them with any gun smith! The Welsh lot then transported her, unlawfully (contrary to Home Office Regulations) nearly 2000 miles, hawking her around England and Wales to fabricate my 10 year term, if evil Dr Tegyn Williams, Caswell Clinic Director Bridgend, failed to convince Cooke, the Recorder of the Cardiff Crown Court and 9 others, also refusing me bail, that I was too dangerous for release (if I won).

Despite the facts known, Welsh police left me at large for months to get the opportunity to have me lawfully shot (see leaked MAPPA minutes).

If it had not been for a little help from my friends around the world, commenting on this blog site, publishing the facts on Nicholas Cooke QC and Dr Williams, they may well have achieved Williams' request, that I be sectioned for life to reside in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric prison.

Williams stated I had 'significant brain damage', possible brain tumour, with no qualification to do so, while Welsh NHS are continuing to allow him to do this to others, less fortunate than me.

This Welsh cabal is still at large, on a whim to hatch any further abuse of process on an unsuspecting citizen so stupid to expose their patch.

letter to Cardiff Magistrates today:

2nd Nov 2010 Cardiff Magistrates Judicial Review Application

10th May 2011

Clerk of the Court,

1. I am still asking for the details of just what went on during my forced illness, protracted by Dr Tegwyn Williams of the South Wales Police Forensic Unit, by his criminally conducted false medical reports without the qualifications so to do?

2. Why were my medical reports not put before the district judge ?

3. Why will you not inform me of the names of the witnesses?

4. Why will you not inform me of evidence, by sending copy of clerk's notes?

5. Why has it taken you 6 months to answer my request for the identification of the judge in question?

6. Other requests in my 3rd Nov 2010 letter to the clerk still remain unanswered.

7. Do you now accept you received it?

8. Will you now answer it?

9. The Crown Prosecution Service state they do not oppose a rehearing with Defence present.

10. I wish to know when District Judge Allan Berg is next sitting in Cardiff in order to arrange a hearing.

Thank you

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

. .

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Protected by Royal Charter so Sale of Maurice's 5 Bedroomed House not even covers RCVS Legal Costs

Maurice — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:25:00 GMT

Investigation into Royal Charters

EXPLICIT ORDER

These orders specifically require ministers and judges* to treat the chartered body ‘in the most favourable and beneficial sense' for its ‘best advantage.' This is to be done despite wrongdoing, specifically including ‘non-recital' (concealment) and ‘mis-recital' (deception).

The 1967 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Act omits ‘mis -recital'

A Number of European Court of Human Rights Applications are currently being prepared in Brittany now that Maurice is struggling but ‘out of the woods, medically and well off the daily morphine!

‘A Royal Charter' is the common thread between the South Wales Police, in 2001, making complaint to have Maurice struck off the veterinary register, for life, just for questioning ‘authority' through the courts and a recent Criminal Court of Appeal Judgment, Regina v Maurice Kirk , for ‘Contempt of Court', currently applied for to go to the Supreme Court as the hearing appears contrary to Article 6.

Dr Tegwyn Williams, in August 2009, was employed by Wales HM Partnership to fabricate false medical evidence, for which he had no qualifications, to have Maurice incarcerated, without trial, in a high security hospital, possibly for life. His medical reports stated Maurice having, ‘significant brain damage and possible tumour'.

Each Royal Charter affecting the ten judges, including the Recorder of Cardiff, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, who three times, alone, refused bail on this medical evidence, that Maurice was too dangerous to be released, can be read on transcripts on this website Downloads.

The Court of Appeal Judgment is likely to refuse permission for the case to go to the Supreme Court due to the fact the ‘argument' with HHJ Cooke QC , in Cardiff Crown Court, a year earlier, had before him the now proved falsified medical evidence, proved by other medical reports, then withheld from His Honour, including a clear brain scan of August 2009 organised by Williams, no less, as Director of the Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend!........

.......this document will expand on a weekly basis until all Royal Charters , affecting Maurice's life, have been appropriately exposed to the general public as a warning of what is yet to come.

copy of HCHR applications shortly and any help in preparation always appreciated.

Happy Easter