Search results matching tags 'Abuse of Process' and 'Alun Cairns MP'

28th June 2011 Criminal Court of Appeal for Appeal re Contempt of Court imprisonment re Dr Tegwyn Williams

SabineKMcNeill — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:32:00 GMT

Mr Justice Moses, Mr Justice Madison and Recorder of Leeds, presiding, to allow or not, eye witnesses and the release from Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, Maurice's medical records of possible brain tumour? £50 for anyone attending and supplying written record of what they both saw and heard.

Criminal Court of Appeal

London

12^th April 2011

Regina v Maurice John Kirk Case number: 201004016C1

Dear Sir,

I wish permission to appeal to the Supreme Court of England and Wales

Some of the Grounds;

Contrary to Article 47 and 1998 Human Rights Act

1. Hearing took place in Appellant's absence despite medical evidence that he could not attend following major surgery in Brittany, France.
2. Lawyer instructed was unable to attend due to ill health.
3. The Cardiff judge had already risen from his seat thereby no court was in session at the time of alleged offence of Contempt of Court.
4. The limited facts before the Court of Appeal, due to failed prosecution disclosure, made it unsafe to dismiss the Appeal.
5. Both Cardiff Court and Criminal Court of Appeal refused eye witnesses, including the police officer in attendance ‘to keep an eye on the Applicant', the latter simply there asking for clarification relating to his suspected brain tumour and diagnosed ‘significant brain damage' causing a ‘paranoid delusional disorder', as set out in 2^nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court records (refused to be disclosed) and numerous psychiatric reports by Dr Tegwyn Williams of Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend.
6. Neither court have considered and/or taken steps to have the Applicant/prisoner/Appellant examined as to the relevance of the ‘mental disorder ‘affecting his conduct on 24^th June 2011.
7. Both Cardiff Crown Courts and The Court of Appeal refused to order clarification of Dr Tegwyn Williams's findings, the latter pleading before 2^nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, in the absence of the prisoner, were sufficiently so serious that he recommended the prisoner be Sectioned, 41, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, to Ashworth high security psychiatric prison.
NO FILE was thrown at the presiding judge.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc (Applicant)

Losing today's Criminal Court of Appeal that carried on without Maurice being able to call the eye witnesses, refused in the lower court or have released the original court record of the incident, three High Court judges ignoring the serious content in his five page submission(below), ignoring the doctor's certificate that Maurice cannot travel to England to fight the case, due to his recent hip operation and most importantly, now, three more judges are backing at least ten previous Cardiff judges that have all refused to make Dr Tegwyn Williams clarify his scandalous 2009 medical reports, purely to have Maurice sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act as he may have a 'brain tumour' but definitely has permanent ,‘significant brain damage', too dangerous to allow release from prison, just about sums up the current state of our UK law courts.

Dr Sheida Oraki , as Maurice's Mackenzie Friend, fought her corner with panache, asking for the usual basic relevant disclosure of evidence, withheld due to the gross embarrassment it would cause the Taffia, left the court clearly of the opinion the UK Criminal courts appear to be in as much a mess as her civil court experiences have revealed.

Just a simple updated Dr Tegwyn Williams medical report, on my 'brain damage', could avoid, currently, three, possibly four, of the on going criminal and civil court proceedings, two shortly for Europe, financed by the tax payer, YOU

France cancels Maurice's five months of asylum protection from South Wales Police

Only a cynic would suggest this is a coincidence

Extract 30/03/11 OPFRA, Paris letter::

"Par ailleurs, La Grande- Bretaqne, Etat membre de l'Union europenne, peut etre regarde conme respectant Ies libertes fondamentales ; ce pays dispose notamment d'un systeme judicialre de nature a garantir a ses ressortissants le droit a un recours effectif en cas d' atteinte a ces libertes. Des lors, sa demande apparait manifestement infonde"

République française,

Ministry of the Interior,

OFPRA

dossier : 2010-12-03992-EU-NHI

The application for asylum by Mr Maurice John KIRK

is rejected for the following reasons:

The applicant, a British subject and former veterinary surgeon, alleges malicious

obstruction by local administrators of the British judiciary system thus, among

other things, preventing him from being reinstated in the Register of the Royal

College of Veterinary Surgeons. He claims to have been threatened with death

at the time of an arrest in 2009 and to have been the victim of illegal psychiatric

imprisonment. A warrant for his arrest was [apparently] issued on 2nd November

2010 for an alleged assault. These disputes have caused delay in the

therapeutic treatment of various other medical problems, in particular

orthopaedic.

However, the applicant has provided no element, in his detailed but, nonetheless

confused, declarations that could seriously establish that he be the object of

persecution or threats without any protection being available in his country of

origin.

Moreover, Great-Britain, a member state of the European Union, can be

regarded as respecting the fundamental liberties ; it is a country that has a

judiciary system intended to guarantee its citizens the right to effective recourse

in cases of infringement of these liberties. Hence, his application appears to be

manifestly unfounded.

Fontenay-sous-Bois, 30th March 2011

Mourad DERBAK

chef de la Division Europe

OFPRA

French Authorities refer to Union Law protecting citizens in any Member State to obtain protection from his or her 'domestic court', tomorrow.

What a joke! Maurice intends to appeal the decision.

It is June 2010. Maurice is in court after seven months unlawful imprisonment, three of which in Dr Tegwyn Williams' psychiatric clinic, the dreaded Caswell Clinic, Bridgend. Williams falsified medical evidence to try and obtain Maurice's permanent imprisonment, without trial, for the South Wales Police defending a 19 year running civil damages claim for bullying, malicious prosecutions, false imprisonments and perverting the course of justice.

He gets so frustrated by the judge not being willing to look at the evidence that he puts a folder on the clerk's desk in a way that is considered, by some, to be in "contempt of court".

Well, in his well-trained ability to appeal, ten months later, he is expected to be in the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Tuesday, April 12th. Time and room can be confirmed from 020 7947 7717. But so far, it's scheduled for 10.30 in Room 5.

Here is his submission.

Here is the Court's letter: you must attend or else your appeal will be dismissed. [His French doctors forbid him to travel for 2 months after his hip was replaced on March 25th.]

And here is the Court's update

Alerting Welsh Ministers to the State of NHS Wales

Maurice — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:40:00 GMT

Carwyn Jones AM
First Minister
National Assembly of Wales

Edwina Hart AM
Minister for Health and Social Services
National Assembly of Wales

23 March 2011

Dear Mr Carwyn Jones AM and Mrs Edwina Hart AM,

Re: My Welsh Operation will now be in France. Is this the best future for Wales?

Important New Evidence that tests the State and Future of Wales NHS.

Mr David Sissling leaves as the local Chief Executive at ABMU LHB to be Chief of the Welsh NHS in May 2011. Edwina Hart as Welsh Health Minister and Mr Win Griffiths as Chairman ABMU LHB were being very helpful by seeking Mr David Sissling to address my concerns.

However, is it your place to intervene on the bigger issues and policy effect on the culture of the Welsh NHS, by whether the future NHS Chief Mr David Sissling's approach is appropriate, for the people of Wales to have confidence in the oversight by Welsh Ministers?

"Clear Evidence" of Brain Damage/Cancer - Available Facts about Dr Tegwyn Williams:

1) It appears, especially given his constant refusal to comment, that Dr Tegwyn Williams decided this brain damage existed without using any appropriately medically qualified doctor to allow or support his conclusion.

2) Yet it seems, when not using anyone medically qualified to progress such a view, that in 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams wrote to the Crown Court to say that there is "clear evidence" that I have brain damage. Furthermore that the brain damage (that Dr Tegwyn Williams says exists) is supposed to also, according to Dr Tegwyn Williams, give an incurable condition leading to an unhelpful behaviour change, so to support that I may need to loose my liberty indefinitely, when I have never been convicted of any relevant or serious offence.

3) Furthermore, Crown Court transcripts of 2 December 2009 record a Crown Prosecution Counsel, Mr Twomlow, saying that Dr Tegwyn Williams wishes his concern about my having brain cancer to affect the decisions by the Crown Court.

"No" Brain Damage, "No" Cancer: by Two Sets of Evidence from both France & Wales.

4) In August 2009 properly qualified medical doctors at the Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend and later, in Southampton University, give an ‘all clear' brain scan result.

5) Yet, Dr Tegwyn Williams asserting brain damage or cancer means that my urgently needed hip operation cannot occur until surgeons are certain of what conditions may exist. Limited disclosure of records only added to confusion and delay as Dr Tegwyn Williams refuses to clarify about brain damage and cancer.

6) In February 2011 properly qualified medical doctors in France did a new brain scan and concluded also an ‘all clear' brain scan result.

Questions I ask be answered:

1. Do six Medical Opinions that contradict what Dr Tegwyn Williams says and his refusal to comment, adequately present a reasonable suspicion for the employer, Mr David Sissling, to act?

2. Why is there inaction to protect minimum standards, when ‘to be seen to act', the employer only needs to ask the General Medical Council to investigate to form their view?

3. Will this inaction justify more people to be forced to refuse to use a belligerent Welsh NHS?

4. Why is the future leader of the Wales NHS allowing and so supporting Dr Tegwyn Williams to behave as he does?

5. I am an Englishman granted Asylum in France in order to avoid Dr Tegwyn Williams' jurisdiction to use his opinion again to cause more harm or affect my liberty.

6. If I have to go to the additional strain of proving in the Welsh civil and criminal courts, by way of a private prosecution, that Dr Tegwyn Williams has acted dishonestly and maliciously, will my needing to so act spearhead that the Wales NHS uphold the basic minimum standards or will I inadvertently, as good as prove that Mr Sissling and therefore Welsh Ministers have abandoned important responsibilities and duties for which they take office and are paid?

7. My wife and daughter continue to live in the Vale of Glamorgan. Can I have your assurance the serious erosion of minimum standards in the Welsh NHS will be immediately addressed and rectified?

As you are both experienced and able politicians, I am sure you will welcome that I look forward to placing your reply alongside various comments on my website.

Yours

Copy to

Mr Win Griffiths, Chairman ABMU LHB
Mr David Sissling, Chief Executive, ABMU LHB
Media Wales
BBC Wales

First Petition to Parliament on Behalf of Victims of White Collar Crime

Maurice — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:22:00 GMT

The following Petition has been submitted to our new MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP, following a very lively debate at our 25th January 2011 House of Commons meeting with both Members of the House of Lords and House of Commons in attendance, a committee room, I may say, STUFFED with Victims of the banks, HM and our law courts, solicitors and NHS (see photo gallery, other blogs and PDF downloads).

To the House of Commons

The petition of Maurice J Kirk BVSc, a citizen of the UK at 52, Tynewydd Road, Barry CF62 8AZ, declares that he has tried everything in his powers as a former veterinary surgeon to stand up to the harassment of South Wales Police who have delayed his civil action against them.

The citizen has suffered from harassment by South Wales Police that culminated in 7 months imprisonment, including 3 months in a psychiatric clinic, after getting him struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons.

One of the incidents in a series of interconnected legal actions was the machine gun case. The allegation was the possession and sale of a ‘gun' even though it was decommissioned and an ‘add on' to an historic aircraft. In the run up to the trial, however, South Wales Police mobilised Multi-Agency Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) hoping to shoot or section the citizen for life. MAPPA categorisation was used for imprisonment which included 3 months in a psychiatric clinic. A leaked MAPPA document, published on his website www.kirkflyingvet.com, shows that the Police had a firearms response.

The harassment included the falsification of medical records claiming that he has serious brain damage, possibly brain cancer, to get him sectioned. This prevented his surgical team from carrying out a hip replacement scheduled for June 2010.

While the citizen won the machine gun case in court, he did not get any costs or compensation for malicious prosecution, false imprisonments and generally the deprivation of his human and professional rights as a veterinary surgeon.

The petitioner therefore requests that the Government steps in as Compensator of Last Resort

Dear Mr Cairns,

The 25th January meeting at the House of Commons was a resounding success with many Members from both Houses, with 'like minds', all in one room! The ever widening divide between the basic rules of justice and the conduct of the South Wales Police, our law courts, Crown Prosecution Service and now, HM Court Service, is really most serious because it is clear there is no accountability for their joint actions.,.

South Wales National Health Service and our Health Minister refuse to hand over my medical records in their current control and with CPS, police, Caswell Clinic, HM Prison, Cardiff, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood are all refusing to clarify, with my surgeons, my medical history when I was in prison custody meaning still further delay in my much needed hip operation.

When can I next see you, please, either in London or Barry? I have currently obtained asylum in France following the repeated attempts by the South Walers Police to either have me shot or jailed for life so any meeting must be before my witnesses and suitably recorded.

Yours sincerely, .

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Do Our Welsh Courts Behave any Worse than Those in England?

Maurice — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:36:00 GMT

I pose a question for the discerning twenty odd % of our Principality’s electorate that bothered to get off their butt, that day, to vote against devolution. Considering the serious situation the UK is now in, suffering from post Blair and his collateral damage, never so bad since early September 1940, may I suggest you browse a few articles in the pockets of this website, written with you in mind, to try and suggest an alternative to ‘Lawful Rebellion’, 'taking to the streets’ and protesting, before we have the wisely predicted, in the 60s, ‘rivers of blood’ or something much worse.

To assist the 'uninitiated', unaware of the day to day 'Affairs of the Welsh State', please read the following 'horror story' as a sample of things to come, if someone, perhaps you, fails to de-rail their tax payer funded 'gravy train'.

Machine Gun Case

•1. 1977: Five decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine guns were designated for various replica period aircraft for museum and display purposes.

•2. 1997: MJK purchased the DH2 aircraft and ‘gun' from a private collection with its log books and other Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) paperwork identifying the ‘gun' as an integral part of the British registered airframe.

•3. . 1998: The 1968 Fire Arms Act was amended meaning that if the ‘gun' remained as it had first been decommissioned, it remained exempt from the new regulations. This later became the critical argument in the 2010 Cardiff Crown Court trial.

•4. 2000: The DH2 flew at the Farnborough Air Show following a personal invitation from Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 Concorde fame. On her return to Wales she suffered a propeller failure.

•5. 2006: The DH2 was moved to RAF Lyneham, Wiltshire, for repair and display with the ‘gun' dismounted for much of the time.

•6. 2007: The DH2 and ‘gun' was handed out at the RAF main gate to a civilian for further repair.

•7. 2008 MJK sold the aircraft and gun to another display pilot who modified the gun, the prosecution knew only too well, for his own purposes.

•8. 1st June 2009 Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) were mobilised by South Wales Police hoping to either shoot or jail MJK, under the 1983 Mental Health Act. This followed the Chief Constable having signed a false affidavit on 25th Feb 09, in the ongoing civil damages claim for false imprisonments and malicious prosecutions, in which she denied knowledge of police incidents including lost court cases and their breaking into MJK's veterinary surgery.

•9. 8th June: MAPPA meeting categorised MJK as Level 3 (top 5% most dangerous) as ‘being in possession of the machine gun and ammunition' based, the court was later told, on photographs and sale adverts, all dating back to the year before and some as far back as 2001, when first advertised for sale in CAA and other aviation journals.

•10. 18th June: MJK obtained entry to the offices of the Chief Constable, at Bridgend HQ, for the purposes of arresting her for falsifying the affidavit. Also, the need for ‘mutual exchange' of witness statements, on a court deadline of 19th June 4pm, meant MJK took them with him to her office. Armed police surrounded the building in tin hats carrying CS and smoke grenades.

•11. 19th June: Solicitors for the police also refused to ‘exchange' witness statements and laid complaint of ‘threat to commit criminal damage' when MJK apparently suggested they may therefore be delivered through their front window, attached to a 'gurt' brick.

12. 21st June: A sizable armed police raid on MJK's home, with helicopter, was aborted only because, the court heard later, MJK was in the garden, drinking tea with his wife and could only be arrested ‘whist away from the house'.

•13. 22nd June: A twenty five plus Trojan police team arrested him in his village, for ‘possession of a machine gun, ammo and threats of criminal damage'. The new owner was then telephoned by the Civil Aviation Authority to deposit ‘gun' with a gun dealer where Welsh police later seized it.

•14. The ‘gun', recovered in Lincolnshire, was then hawked from pillar to post, well over 2000 miles, in the back of Welsh police cars, all over England and Wales, often by only one police officer, contrary to regulations, attempting to get someone somewhere to state the pile of WW1 metal was dangerous while MJK was n possession, a year earlier and now, in its newly modified state.

•15. 23rd June: MJK is charged with ‘possession of machine gun' and its ‘resale', each carrying two mandatory five year prison sentences, with the original seller of the gun to MJK and final recipient promised immunity to prosecution for they were needed as prosecution witnesses.

•16. 24th June: Barry Magistrates' unconditional bail was immediately overturned on CPS Appeal, next day, when he was remanded in custody by Cardiff Crown Court, despite there being no evidence given of ‘likely to abscond', ‘re offend' or would ‘commit a crime'. Nine further Welsh judges were to refuse him bail over nearly eight months which, with their original argument that he was mentally far too dangerous to be given bail, leaves many un answered questions.

•17. 2nd December: The Crown Prosecutor and Dr Tegwyn Williams pleaded in Cardiff Crown Court, using falsified NHS medical records, to have MJK sectioned to a High Security Psychiatric Prison, for life. Only the foresight of an already prepared defense, by way of a privately funded neuro-radiologist's report, served on Cardiff Crown Court just the day before, saved the day

•18. 25th January 2010: The ridiculous trial, therefore, had to go ahead, so relevant disclosure of the conspiracy and access to MJK's potential witnesses was sufficiently blocked by the trial judge to further anger the jury, as MJK was told, when meeting the them immediately after the trial.

•19. 9th February: Cross examination of police was so seriously restricted the jury, therefore, were not allowed to hear any defense evidence. The Jury informed MJK their verdict was concluded after the very first day of prosecution evidence. Cross examination of police witnesses confirmed they had also modified the ‘gun' to protect their prosecution witnesses by attempting to revert the piece of metal back to fit MJK's 2008 photographs published on his web site. He was never allowed to examine the prosecution main exhibit, the ‘gun;, before or during the trial.

•20. April. The trial judge refused MJK any costs, not even for transcripts of hearings in his absence, previously ordered to be reimbursed by The Recorder of Cardiff, HHJ N Cooke QC or claim bus fares and hotel bills incurred by his witnesses who had travelled from all over the country.

•21. 24th June: Judge Cooke sentenced MJK to prison for 28 days for arguing over the disclosure of his falsified medical records used by Dr Tegwyn Williams which, today, is still delaying his much needed hip operation. Judge Cooke also reversed his earlier decision that MJK could hear the tape, see the court logs and be reimbursed for the pre paid court transcripts.

•22. MJK's Contempt of Court appeal is currently before the Criminal Court of Appeal in London where he will, again, be asking Their Lordships for the release of those medical records, that stated,‘ significant brain damage' and ‘possible brain tumour', concocted by the HM Crown Prosecutor, Mr Thomlow, Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood before His Honour Judge Bidder QC, on 2nd Dec 2009, with MJK, unrepresented, locked up below the court.

•23. DAMAGES are sought for malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, fraudulent sectioning and for their deliberate delaying the civil action against South Wales Police that had been running for nearly 19 years. The conduct of HM Court Service and others leaves MJK in some difficulties.

•24. The entire Welsh National Health Service has now closed ranks in this multi agency ‘cover up' with the Welsh Health Minister, Edwina Hart AM, area NHS manager, Mr David Sissling, HM Prison Medical Centre, Cardiff Crown Court, Recorder of Cardiff, Nicholas Cooke QC, Princess of Wales Hospital Records Department, Caswell Clinic Psychiatric Prison, Cardiff Civil Court judges, General Medical Council (Wales), Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Roger Wood, the original culprits, all, apparently, ‘burying their heads in sand' expecting the consequences of their orchestrated conduct, causing so much suffering, to disappear..

•25. Meanwhile French doctors, just as MJK's private surgical team in South Wales did, in June 2010, have cancelled an urgent hip replacement operation due to the Principality's refusal to clarify just what went on in MAPPA at least seven meetings in 2009, to have MJK in a position to be possibly shot or spirited away, behind bars, for life, on spurious medical grounds fabricated on the original instructions of senior officers of the South Wales Police.

•26. Only a Government Remedy can compensate for the violation of human and professional rights by the Welsh authorities once again experienced by myself.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

4th February 2011

Welsh Assembly Elections draw Near, Edwina Hart AM, Jane Hutt AM

Maurice — Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:02:00 GMT

Subject: ATTENTION: DAVID SISSLING - WALES NHS

Dear Mr. Sissling

MAURICE KIRK

I am a Canadian writer who has been following the story of Mr. Maurice Kirk very closely, and I wondered if you would kindly confirm that:

(a)   Mr. Kirk, his Member of Parliament, and the Minister of Health wrote to you, asking for his medical files so that he could have much needed surgery, and

(b)   you have not yet provided them please?

I am working on a follow up story regarding one of the recent news reports about Maurice Kirk but, at the same time, I am writing another story on Britain today, which includes health care and policing, as well as other social issues.

Flying Vet Approaches UK Parliament in Fight against South Wales Police

Could you please tell me

(a) how long you can legally withhold Mr. Kirk's healthcare file in the UK, and what would be possible reasons for doing so?

(c)   what are the statutes of limitations in Britain and Europe, were he to sue you personally for Breach of Care Causing Harm, Failure to Act, and other gross negligence issues?

(d)   have you been mandated to withhold his file by police, or some other body and, if so, what are their reasons for that please? If not, is this an oversight, or have you been away on vacation with nobody to act in your place when you are absent? Is there a policy for staff to handle correspondence in your absence, or do they wait for your return?

(e)   Are you aware that it is also human rights issue to deny someone medical care, directly or indirectly, and that human rights activists around the world are monitoring Mr. Kirk's story?

(f)     Would you say that you will be in a position to respond to the letters sent to you by Mr. Kirk, his Member of Parliament, and the Minister of Health Edwina Hart by November 3, 2010? If not, could you explain please?

(g)   Are you aware that withholding medical treatment, either directly or indirectly, is not only Elder Abuse, but much worse?

(h)   Is this standard practice in the UK, or is it simply an oversight?

(i)     Is there a policy in the UK to prevent the elderly from expensive surgery or hospital stays, due to a drain on the healthcare system? Would this be a reason to deny Maurice Kirk's request?

(j)      Is there a shortage of doctors and healthcare providers, as there is in Canada, and would this be a reason to deny Mr. Kirk treatment?

(k)   Now that you are aware of the urgent need for Mr. Kirk's file, will you be able to deliver it please, or afford the MP, Minister of Health and Mr. Kirk the courtesy of a reply to their letters?

(l)      Would you be able to send it via express courier, or is there an NHS policy not to use couriers in your country?

(m)     Do you need to be supplied with extra copies of the letters that were sent to you? Have they been lost?

I very much look forward to hearing from you, as Canadians are puzzled as to why Mr. Kirk's files have not been sent. In Canada, his request would come under the Freedom of Information Act, and you would have only 30 days to respond to the request, so we are watching the outcome with great interest.

Thank you so much for your co-operation.

Yours sincerely,

Anonymous

Ms Kate Bloomfield,
Deputy Head of Redress and Investigations,
National Health Service
Port Talbot
South Wales

26th December 2010

NHS Withheld Falsified Medical Records of Maurice John Kirk

It is over a year now since a Dr Tegwyn Williams and a Professor Roger Wood agreed to submit apparently erroneous medical evidence to the 2nd December 09 Cardiff Crown Court hearing with HHJ Bidder QC. They recommended I be sectioned to HM Broadmoor, IPP, Imprisonment for Public Protection.

I understand the Crown Prosecutor heard Dr Williams tell the court I may have a brain tumour along with the joint diagnosed opinion, of the two named doctors, that I had 'significant brain damage'. See here for request of information by HH Judge Seys Llewellyn QC and transcript of hearing.

1. HM Court Service refuse to disclose the evidence given to the judge either by my access to tape, transcript or court log, all public documents from a court of so called record.

2. No NHS doctor or South Wales NHS department, with that information, will respond to my request for that urgent record to be disclosed.

3. The GMC also appear to ignore my complaints on the matter which is, of course, of no surprise.

4. Lawyers, Morgan Cole, employed by you, have also failed to inform me of any reasoning as to why either my GP or myself are not entitled to that information, especially in the light of both my orthopaedic surgeon and anaesthetist, for my now long overdue operation, having also asked for it.

5. Various dubiously safe but unnecessary brain scans, taken in September 09, to recommend my further incarceration in NHS Caswell Clinic Prison were referred to in the 2nd December 09 evidence as significant. These scans were recommended, by both doctors, to be repeated within six months. No mention of this has since been made to me and despite my requests, both in custody and since my acquittal in February 09 of all charges, I am being refused any follow up scan or appropriate clinical examination.

6. HM Crown Prosecution Service, Cardiff, have also received the record used in that 2nd December 09 hearing. CPS, Wales, also refuse to disclose any of the proceedings, held in my absence, it having been dependent on this collusion with your NHS in order to avoid the January 2010 scheduled trial of scandalous indictments levelled against me, each carrying a five year prison sentence.

7. Your department's conduct in this matter, for well over a one year period, clearly points to criminal conduct by just too many in positions of privilege, the very reason for this widespread cover up.

8. So I wish to know for just how much longer you and others in the South Wales NHS intend to continue covering up this incident? Will you eventually break ranks or pretend I and my many supporters have just crawled back under a large stone?

9. In other words:
a.what prevents you from disclosing and releasing the specific documents in question?
b. why have Morgan Cole not written to me as you had announced?
c. why didn't you follow up by email when you wrote you wanted to deliver documents by mail?
d. if you think those documents satisfy my doctors' requirements, include the 2nd December 09 material, you can still send them to me at my address in France where I am in political asylum due to South Wales Police persecution and threat on my life: Puits aux Papillons, St. Doha, 22230 Merdrignac, Brittany.

Looking forward to hearing from you in due course,

Copy to Alun Cairns MP, Edwina Hart AM